Advertisement
AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


AJPH First Look, published online ahead of print Nov 12, 2009
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
AJPH.2008.153767v1
100/1/24    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow purchase articles
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Get other permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Frosch, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Kravitz, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Frosch, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Kravitz, R. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Health Policy
January 2010, Vol 100, No. 1 | American Journal of Public Health 24-32
© 2010 American Public Health Association
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.153767


HEALTH POLICY AND ETHICS

A Decade of Controversy: Balancing Policy With Evidence in the Regulation of Prescription Drug Advertising

Dominick L. Frosch, PhD, David Grande, MD, MPA, Derjung M. Tarn, MD, PhD and Richard L. Kravitz, MD, MSPH

Dominick L. Frosch is with the Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles. Dominick L. Frosch and David Grande are with the Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. David Grande is also with the Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. Derjung M. Tarn is with the Department of Family Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles. Richard L. Kravitz is with the Division of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, and the Center for Healthcare Policy and Research, University of California, Davis.

Correspondence: Correspondence should be sent to Dominick L. Frosch, Department of Health Services Research, Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, Ames Bldg, 795 El Camino Real, Palo Alto, CA 94301 (e-mail: froschd{at}pamfri.org). Reprints can be ordered at http://www.ajph.org by clicking the "Reprints/Eprints" link.

Direct-to-consumer advertising (DTCA) of prescription drugs has remained controversial since regulations were liberalized by the Food and Drug Administration in 1997.

We reviewed empirical evidence addressing the claims made in the policy debate for and against DTCA. This advertising has some benefits, but significant risks are evident as well, magnified by the prominence of DTCA in population-level health communications.

To minimize potential harm and maximize the benefits of DTCA for population health, the quality and quantity of information should be improved to enable consumers to better self-identify whether treatment is indicated, more realistically appraise the benefits, and better attend to the risks associated with prescription drugs. We propose guidelines for improving the utility of prescription drug advertising.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2010 by the American Public Health Association