Advertisement
AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


AJPH First Look, published online ahead of print Dec 17, 2009
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
AJPH.2008.153759v1
100/2/264    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow purchase articles
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Get other permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mukamel, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Osler, T. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mukamel, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Osler, T. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Health Policy
Right arrow Quality of Care
Right arrow Public Health Practice
Right arrow Other Statistics/Evaluation/Research
February 2010, Vol 100, No. 2 | American Journal of Public Health 264-269
© 2010 American Public Health Association
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.153759


FRAMING HEALTH MATTERS

Measuring Quality for Public Reporting of Health Provider Quality: Making It Meaningful to Patients

Dana B. Mukamel, PhD, Laurent G. Glance, MD, Andrew W. Dick, PhD and Turner M. Osler, MD

At the time of this study, Dana B. Mukamel was with the Health Policy Research Institute, University of California, Irvine; Laurent G. Glance was with the University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY; Andrew W. Dick was with the RAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, PA; and Turner M. Osler was with the Department of Surgery, University of Vermont, Burlington.

Correspondence: Correspondence can be sent to Dana Mukamel, PhD, Health Policy Research Institute, University of California-Irvine, 100 Theory, Suite 110, Irvine, CA 92697-5800 (e-mail: dmukamel{at}uci.edu). Reprints can be ordered at http://www.ajph.org by clicking the "Reprints/Eprints" link.

Public quality reports of hospitals, health plans, and physicians are being used to promote efficiency and quality in the health care system. Shrinkage estimators have been proposed as superior measures of quality to be used in these reports because they offer more conservative and stable quality ranking of providers than traditional, nonshrinkage estimators. Adopting the perspective of a patient faced with choosing a local provider on the basis of publicly provided information, we examine the advantages and disadvantages of shrinkage and nonshrinkage estimators and contrast the information made available by them. We demonstrate that 2 properties of shrinkage estimators make them less useful than nonshrinkage estimators for patients making choices in their area of residence.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2010 by the American Public Health Association