Advertisement
AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


AJPH First Look, published online ahead of print Dec 17, 2009
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
AJPH.2008.154468v1
100/2/319    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow purchase articles
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Get other permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alexander, G. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Alexander, G. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Managed Care
Right arrow Health Promotion
Right arrow Media
Right arrow Nutrition/Food
Right arrow Prevention
Right arrow Health Education
February 2010, Vol 100, No. 2 | American Journal of Public Health 319-326
© 2010 American Public Health Association
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.154468


RESEARCH AND PRACTICE

A Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating Online Interventions to Improve Fruit and Vegetable Consumption

Gwen L. Alexander, PhD, Jennifer B. McClure, PhD, Josephine H. Calvi, MPH, George W. Divine, PhD, Melanie A. Stopponi, MPA, Sharon J. Rolnick, PhD, Jerianne Heimendinger, DSc, Dennis D. Tolsma, MPH, Kenneth Resnicow, PhD, Marci K. Campbell, PhD, Victor J. Strecher, PhD, Christine Cole Johnson, PhD and for the MENU Choices Team

Gwen L. Alexander, George W. Divine, and Christine Cole Johnson are with the Department of Biostatistics and Research Epidemiology, Henry Ford Hospital and Health System, Detroit, MI. Jennifer B. McClure is with Group Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA. Josephine H. Calvi and Dennis D. Tolsma are with the Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Georgia, Atlanta. Melanie A. Stopponi is with the Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Denver. Sharon J. Rolnick is with HealthPartners Research Foundation, Minneapolis, MN. Jerianne Heimendinger is with the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver. Kenneth Resnicow and Victor J. Strecher are with the Department of Health Education and Health Behavior, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor. Marci K. Campbell is with the Department of Nutrition, University of North Carolina School of Public Health, Chapel Hill.

Correspondence: Correspondence can be sent to Christine Cole Johnson, PhD, Department of Biostatistics and Research Epidemiology, Henry Ford Hospital and Health Center, One Ford Place 5C, Detroit, MI 48202 (e-mail cjohnso1{at}hfhs.org). Reprints can be ordered at http://www.ajph.org by clicking the "Reprints/Eprints" link.

Objectives. We assessed change in fruit and vegetable intake in a population-based sample, comparing an online untailored program (arm 1) with a tailored behavioral intervention (arm 2) and with a tailored behavioral intervention plus motivational interviewing–based counseling via e-mail (arm 3).

Methods. We conducted a randomized controlled intervention trial, enrolling members aged 21 to 65 years from 5 health plans in Seattle, Washington; Denver, Colorado; Minneapolis, Minnesota; Detroit, Michigan; and Atlanta, Georgia. Participants reported fruit and vegetable intake at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months. We assessed mean change in fruit and vegetable servings per day at 12 months after baseline, using a validated self-report fruit and vegetable food frequency questionnaire.

Results. Of 2540 trial participants, 80% were followed up at 12 months. Overall baseline mean fruit and vegetable intake was 4.4 servings per day. Average servings increased by more than 2 servings across all study arms (P < .001), with the greatest increase (+2.8 servings) among participants of arm 3 (P = .05, compared with control). Overall program satisfaction was high.

Conclusions. This online nutritional intervention was well received, convenient, easy to disseminate, and associated with sustained dietary change. Such programs have promise as population-based dietary interventions.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2010 by the American Public Health Association