Advertisement
AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 71, Issue 6 620-625, Copyright © 1981 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow purchase articles
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Get other permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ware, J E
Right arrow Articles by Lohr, K N
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ware, J E, Jr
Right arrow Articles by Lohr, K N
Choosing measures of health status for individuals in general populations.

J E Ware, Jr, R H Brook, A R Davies and K N Lohr

This paper offers suggestions to adi the selection of appropriate instruments and data gathering methods for studies that require measures of personal health status applicable in general populations. Before selecting measures, the reason for studying health status must be identified. Next, definitional issues arise when attempting to specify the components of health that are to be studied. Evidence supports restriction of the definition of personal health status to its physical and mental components, rather than including social circumstances as well. In evaluating the suitability of available measures, three features must be considered: 1) practicality in terms of administration, respondent burden, and analysis; 2) reliability in terms of the study design and group or individual comparisons; 3) validity, in terms of providing information about the particular health components of interest to the study. Evaluating validity will be difficult for most available measures; careful attention to item content will be helpful in choosing appropriate measures. Despite problems in development and interpretation, overall health status indicators will prove useful to many studies and should be considered, as should both subjective and objective measures of health status. Given that the reasons to measure health have been identified, the aspects of health to be measured specified, and attention paid to their suitability, appropriate measures may often be found among those now available.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Sports. Med.Home page
N P Bent, C C Wright, A B Rushton, and M E Batt
Selecting outcome measures in sports medicine: a guide for practitioners using the example of anterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation
Br. J. Sports Med., December 1, 2009; 43(13): 1006 - 1012.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Dent EducHome page
G. Tsakos
Combining Normative and Psychosocial Perceptions for Assessing Orthodontic Treatment Needs
J Dent Educ., August 1, 2008; 72(8): 876 - 885.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Board Fam MedHome page
J. K. Carroll, K. Fiscella, S. C. Meldrum, G. C. Williams, C. N. Sciamanna, P. Jean-Pierre, G. R. Morrow, and R. M. Epstein
Clinician-Patient Communication About Physical Activity in an Underserved Population
J Am Board Fam Med, March 1, 2008; 21(2): 118 - 127.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AJPHHome page
L. N. Rubalcava, G. M. Teruel, D. Thomas, and N. Goldman
The Healthy Migrant Effect: New Findings From the Mexican Family Life Survey
Am J Public Health, January 1, 2008; 98(1): 78 - 84.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
I. COULTER, J. M. YAMAMOTO, M. MARCUS, J. FREED, C. DER-MARTIROSIAN, N. GUZMAN-BECERRA, L. J. BROWN, and A. GUAY
Self-reported oral health of enrollees in capitated and fee-for-service dental benefit plans
J Am Dent Assoc, November 1, 2004; 135(11): 1606 - 1615.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
C. Phornphutkul, W. J. Introne, M. B. Perry, I. Bernardini, M. D. Murphey, D. L. Fitzpatrick, P. D. Anderson, M. Huizing, Y. Anikster, L. H. Gerber, et al.
Natural History of Alkaptonuria
N. Engl. J. Med., December 26, 2002; 347(26): 2111 - 2121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
P. E. Falcoz, S. Chocron, M. Mercier, M. Puyraveau, and J. P. Etievent
Comparison of the Nottingham Health Profile and the 36-item health survey questionnaires in cardiac surgery
Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2002; 73(4): 1222 - 1228.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
A. J Carr, B. Gibson, and P. G Robinson
Measuring quality of life: Is quality of life determined by expectations or experience?
BMJ, May 19, 2001; 322(7296): 1240 - 1243.
[Full Text]


Home page
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck SurgHome page
A. C. Sherman, S. Simonton, D. C. Adams, E. Vural, B. Owens, and E. Hanna
Assessing Quality of Life in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer: Cross-validation of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Head and Neck Module (QLQ-H&N35)
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, April 1, 2000; 126(4): 459 - 467.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Med Care Res RevHome page
J. S. Larson
The Conceptualization of Health
Med Care Res Rev, June 1, 1999; 56(2): 123 - 136.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Aging HealthHome page
K. Avlund, M. Davidsen, and K. Schultz-Larsen
Changes in Functional Ability from Ages 70 to 75: A Danish Longitudinal Study
J Aging Health, May 1, 1995; 7(2): 254 - 282.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
I. B. Wilson and P. D. Cleary
Linking Clinical Variables With Health-Related Quality of Life: A Conceptual Model of Patient Outcomes
JAMA, January 4, 1995; 273(1): 59 - 65.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
D. M. Romney, C. D. Jenkins, and J. M. Bynner
A Structural Analysis of Health-Related Quality of Life Dimensions
Human Relations, February 1, 1992; 45(2): 165 - 176.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Journal of EvaluationHome page
E. Bonwich and J. C. Reid
Medical Rehabilitation: Issues in Assessment of Functional Change
American Journal of Evaluation, October 1, 1991; 12(3): 205 - 215.
[PDF]


Home page
Arch Gen PsychiatryHome page
J. S. Markowitz, M. M. Weissman, R. Ouellette, J. D. Lish, and G. L. Klerman
Quality of Life in Panic Disorder
Arch Gen Psychiatry, November 1, 1989; 46(11): 984 - 992.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
C. R. MacKenzie, M. E. Charlson, D. DiGioia, and K. Kelley
A Patient-Specific Measure of Change in Maximal Function
Arch Intern Med, July 1, 1986; 146(7): 1325 - 1329.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
M. S. Thompson
Health Versus Money: Value Judgments in the Perspective of Decision Analysis
Med Decis Making, January 1, 1983; 3(3): 285 - 297.
[PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1981 by the American Public Health Association