Advertisement
AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 71, Issue 7 687-693, Copyright © 1981 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow purchase articles
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Get other permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mates, S.
Right arrow Articles by Sidel, V. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mates, S.
Right arrow Articles by Sidel, V. W.
Quality Assessment by Process and Outcome Methods: Evaluation of Emergency Room Care of Asthmatic Adults

Susan Mates and Victor W. Sidel

Weighted process criteria based on chart review and weighted outcome criteria based on telephone interview were used to assess the quality of care for adult patients with asthma in the emergency rooms of a municipal and a voluntary hospital which share medical personnel. Process scores were highly correlated with 24-hour outcome scores at both hospitals but not with 7-day outcome scores. Our findings suggest that appropriate weighted process and outcome criteria are valid and useful methods for quality assessment, and underline the importance of choice of an appropriate "time window" for assessment of outcome. In addition, these assessment methods provide important "feedback" information for those providing care in the emergency room. (Am J Public Health 1981;71:687-693)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Int J Qual Health CareHome page
C. Hongoro, B. McPake, and P. Vickerman
Measuring the quality of hospital tuberculosis services: a prospective study in four Zimbabwe hospitals
Int. J. Qual. Health Care, August 1, 2005; 17(4): 287 - 292.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eval Health ProfHome page
R. Tamblyn
Is the Public being Protected? Prevention of Suboptimalmedical Practice Through Training Programs and Credentialing Examinations
Eval Health Prof, June 1, 1994; 17(2): 198 - 221.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Eval Health ProfHome page
C. H. Slater
An Analysis of Ambulatory Care Quality Assessment Research
Eval Health Prof, December 1, 1989; 12(4): 347 - 378.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Eval Health ProfHome page
A. Donabedian
Twenty Years of Research on the Quality of Medical Care: 1964-1984
Eval Health Prof, September 1, 1985; 8(3): 243 - 265.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Eval Health ProfHome page
M. S. Thompson, R. H. Palmer, J. K. Rothrock, R. Strain, L. H. Brachman, and E. A. Wright
The Cost of Quality Assurance in Medicine
Eval Health Prof, September 1, 1983; 6(3): 283 - 297.
[Abstract] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1981 by the American Public Health Association