HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Submit a response View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Weiss, N S Articles by Chow, W H Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Weiss, N S Articles by Chow, W H

Control definition in case-control studies of ectopic pregnancy.

N S Weiss, J R Daling and W H Chow

In case-control studies of ectopic pregnancy, the optimal sampling frame for control selection is influenced heavily by the hypothesis being tested. The selection of women completing an intrauterine pregnancy, a common choice for a control group in studies to date, is appropriate only if the hypothesis does not relate to exposures that selectively prevent an intrauterine pregnancy (e.g., use of an intrauterine device (IUD) at the time of conception). Even for other exposures, the selection of such women can yield misleading results if the exposure is related to the likelihood of completion of the intrauterine pregnancy. On the other hand, the selection of nonpregnant women as controls, while permitting a valid evaluation of the risk associated with exposure such as the use of an IUD, can introduce a substantial degree of incomparability between cases and controls with regard to other contraceptive practices and their correlates. Whichever of the two sampling frames that is chosen, an appreciation of these potential biases can lead to ways of tailoring the selection of individual controls to minimize the magnitude of the bias.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Bouyer, J. Coste, T. Shojaei, J.-L. Pouly, H. Fernandez, L. Gerbaud, and N. Job-Spira Risk Factors for Ectopic Pregnancy: A Comprehensive Analysis Based on a Large Case-Control, Population-based Study in France Am. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2003; 157(3): 185 - 194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L.M. Irvine and M.E. Setchell Declining incidence of ectopic pregnancy in a UK city health district between 1990 and 1999 Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2001; 16(10): 2230 - 2234. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. L. Holt, J. Chu, J. R. Daling, A. S. Stergachis, and N. S. Weiss Tubal Sterilization and Subsequent Ectopic Pregnancy: A Case-Control Study JAMA, July 10, 1991; 266(2): 242 - 246. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. S. Weiss and J. R. Daling Risk Factors for Ectopic Pregnancy JAMA, September 16, 1988; 260(11): 1553 - 1554. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. A. Marchbanks, J. F. Annegers, C. B. Coulam, J. H. Strathy, and L. T. Kurland Risk Factors for Ectopic Pregnancy: A Population-Based Study JAMA, March 25, 1988; 259(12): 1823 - 1827. [Abstract] [PDF]