Interviewing physicians: the effect of improved response rate.
M L Berk
This analysis of data from the Physicians' Practice Survey indicatesthat estimates made from early responders closely approximatethose obtained at the conclusion of a longer field period.
This article has been cited by other articles:
C. J. Fries Classification of complementary and alternative medical practices: Family physicians' ratings of effectiveness
Can Fam Physician,
November 1, 2008;
54(11):
1570 - 1571.e7.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
J. B. VanGeest, T. P. Johnson, and V. L. Welch Methodologies for Improving Response Rates in Surveys of Physicians: A Systematic Review
Eval Health Prof,
December 1, 2007;
30(4):
303 - 321.
[Abstract][PDF]
S. L. Taylor, A. Fremont, A. K. Jain, R. McLaughlin, E. Peterson, T. B. Ferguson Jr, and N. Lurie Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Care: The Perspectives of Cardiovascular Surgeons
Ann. Thorac. Surg.,
February 1, 2006;
81(2):
531 - 536.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
E. Puleo, J. Zapka, M. J. White, J. Mouchawar, C. Somkin, and S. Taplin Caffeine, Cajoling, and Other Strategies to Maximize Clinician Survey Response Rates
Eval Health Prof,
June 1, 2002;
25(2):
169 - 184.
[Abstract][PDF]
S. I. Woodruff, T. L. Conway, and C. C. Edwards Increasing Response Rates to a Smoking Survey for U.S. Navy Enlisted Women
Eval Health Prof,
June 1, 2000;
23(2):
172 - 181.
[Abstract][PDF]
E. Frank, J. Breyan, and L. Elon Physician Disclosure of Healthy Personal Behaviors Improves Credibility and Ability to Motivate
Arch Fam Med,
March 1, 2000;
9(3):
287 - 290.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
G. W. Donaldson, C. M. Moinpour, N. E. Bush, M. Chapko, J. Jocom, M. Siadak, M. Nielsen-Stoeck, J. M. Bradshaw, I. Bichindaritz, and K. M. Sullivan Physician Participation in Research Surveys: A Randomized Study of Inducements to Return Mailed Research Questionnaires
Eval Health Prof,
December 1, 1999;
22(4):
427 - 441.
[Abstract][PDF]
M. L. Berk, C. D. Mueller, and S. Thran Can Survey Data Be Used to Estimate Physician Practice Costs?
Eval Health Prof,
March 1, 1996;
19(1):
14 - 29.
[Abstract][PDF]
J. A. Parsons, R. B. Warnecke, R. F. Czaja, J. Barnsley, and A. Kaluzny Factors Associated With Response Rates in a National Survey of Primary Care Physicians
Eval Rev,
December 1, 1994;
18(6):
756 - 766.
[Abstract][PDF]
M. L. Berk, W. S. Edwards, and N. L. Gay The Use of a Prepaid Incentive to Convert Nonresponders on a Survey of Physicians
Eval Health Prof,
June 1, 1993;
16(2):
239 - 245.
[PDF]
R. M. Bostick, P. Pirie, R. V. Luepker, and P. M. Kofron Using Physician Caller Follow-Ups to Improve the Response Rate to a Physician Telephone Survey: Its Impact and Its Implications
Eval Health Prof,
December 1, 1992;
15(4):
420 - 433.
[Abstract][PDF]
J. Sobal, B. R. DeForge, K. S. Ferentz, H. L. Muncie Jr, C. M. Valente, and D. M. Levine Physician Responses to Multiple Questionnaire Mailings
Eval Rev,
December 1, 1990;
14(6):
711 - 722.
[Abstract][PDF]
E. Guadagnoli and S. Cunningham The Effects of Nonresponse and Late Response on a Survey of Physician Attitudes
Eval Health Prof,
September 1, 1989;
12(3):
318 - 328.
[Abstract][PDF]
J. Sobal and K. S. Ferentz Comparing Physicians' Responses to the First and Second Mailings of a Questionnaire
Eval Health Prof,
September 1, 1989;
12(3):
329 - 339.
[Abstract][PDF]
P. D. Mullen, I. Easling, S. A. Nixon, D. R. Koester, and A. K. Biddle The Cost-Effectiveness of Randomized Incentive and Follow-Up Contacts in a National Mail Survey of Family Physicians
Eval Health Prof,
June 1, 1987;
10(2):
232 - 245.
[Abstract][PDF]