HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Submit a response View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (10) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sinks, T Articles by Wallingford, K M Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Sinks, T Articles by Wallingford, K M

Two episodes of acute illness in a machine shop.

T Sinks, P R Kerndt and K M Wallingford

Hazards Evaluations and Technical Assistance Branch, NIOSH, CDC, Cincinnati, OH 45226-2998.

Following an explosion in a machine shop and temporary plant closure, on the day the plant returned to full operations a degreaser malfunctioned. Workers in the assembly room were exposed to trichloroethylene levels later estimated to have exceeded 220 ppm (OSHA PEL 100 ppm). The plant was evacuated and the degreaser taken out of operation. Blood testing for carbon monoxide (CO) on five employees found carboxyhemoglobin levels in excess of normal. The plant reopened the following morning. Over the next two weeks, 15 employees were seen by the plant nurses for similar complaints; although all returned to work, their carboxyhemoglobin levels, later found to be inaccurate, were reported by a local medical clinic to range from 13.7 to 20.0 percent. At the end of the second week, another outbreak of illness occurred, but carboxyhemoglobin, trichloroethylene, fluorocarbons, and methylene chloride were not elevated in all 17 persons tested; plant-wide monitoring for CO found no elevated levels. During the first outbreak of illness, cases were 2.26 times as likely to have entered the assembly room as noncases. During the second outbreak, cases were no more likely than noncases to have entered the assembly room. We believe the explosion, earlier toxic exposures and illness, and the misleading blood test results led to plant-wide anxiety which culminated in a collective stress reaction and the second outbreak. An open meeting with all employees, informing them of our findings, provided reassurance and no further episodes of illness occurred in this workforce.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. E. BARTHOLOMEW and S. WESSELY Protean nature of mass sociogenic illness: From possessed nuns to chemical and biological terrorism fears The British Journal of Psychiatry, April 1, 2002; 180(4): 300 - 306. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. E. Bartholomew and F. Occupational Mass Psychogenic Illness: A Transcultural Perspective Transcultural Psychiatry, December 1, 2000; 37(4): 495 - 524. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. W. Small, D. T. Feinberg, D. Steinberg, and M. T. Collins A Sudden Outbreak of Illness Suggestive of Mass Hysteria in Schoolchildren Arch Fam Med, August 1, 1994; 3(8): 711 - 716. [Abstract] [PDF]