Advertisement
AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 81, Issue 6 725-728, Copyright © 1991 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow purchase articles
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Get other permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stout, N
Right arrow Articles by Bell, C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stout, N
Right arrow Articles by Bell, C
Effectiveness of source documents for identifying fatal occupational injuries: a synthesis of studies.

N Stout and C Bell

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, WV 26505.

BACKGROUND: The complete and accurate identification of fatal occupational injuries among the US work force is an important first step in developing work injury prevention efforts. Numerous sources of information, such as death certificates, Workers' Compensation files, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) files, medical examiner records, state health and labor department reports, and various combinations of these, have been used to identify cases of work-related fatal injuries. Recent studies have questioned the effectiveness of these sources for identifying such cases. METHODS: At least 10 studies have used multiple sources to define the universe of fatal work injuries within a state and to determine the capture rates, or proportion of the universe identified, by each source. Results of these studies, which are not all available in published literature, are summarized here in a format that allows researchers to readily compare the ascertainment capabilities of the sources. RESULTS: The overall average capture rates of sources were as follows: death certificates, 81%; medical examiner records, 61%; Workers' Compensation reports, 57%; and OSHA reports 32%. Variations by state and value added through the use of multiple sources are presented and discussed. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis of 10 state-based studies summarizes the effectiveness of various source documents for capturing cases of fatal occupational injuries to help researchers make informed decisions when designing occupational injury surveillance systems.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Inj. Prev.Home page
R D Comstock, S Mallonee, and F Jordan
A comparison of two surveillance systems for deaths related to violent injury
Inj. Prev., February 1, 2005; 11(1): 58 - 63.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
D Loomis, D B Richardson, J F Bena, and A J Bailer
Deindustrialisation and the long term decline in fatal occupational injuries
Occup. Environ. Med., July 1, 2004; 61(7): 616 - 621.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Epidemiol RevHome page
J. M. Horan and S. Mallonee
Injury Surveillance
Epidemiol. Rev., August 1, 2003; 25(1): 24 - 42.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
T Driscoll, R Mitchell, J Mandryk, S Healey, L Hendrie, and B Hull
Coverage of work related fatalities in Australia by compensation and occupational health and safety agencies
Occup. Environ. Med., March 1, 2003; 60(3): 195 - 200.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Inj. Prev.Home page
D Loomis, J F Bena, and A J Bailer
Diversity of trends in occupational injury mortality in the United States, 1980-96
Inj. Prev., March 1, 2003; 9(1): 9 - 14.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Inj. Prev.Home page
A J Taylor, G McGwin Jr, F Valent, and L W Rue III
Fatal occupational electrocutions in the United States
Inj. Prev., December 1, 2002; 8(4): 306 - 312.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
F. Valent, G. McGwin Jr, M. Bovenzi, and F. Barbone
Fatal Work-Related Inhalation of Harmful Substances in the United States
Chest, March 1, 2002; 121(3): 969 - 975.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
D. Loomis, S. H. Wolf, C. W. Runyan, S. W. Marshall, and J. D. Butts
Homicide on the Job: Workplace and Community Determinants
Am. J. Epidemiol., September 1, 2001; 154(5): 410 - 417.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Inj. Prev.Home page
A-M Feyer, A M Williamson, N Stout, T Driscoll, H Usher, and J D Langley
Comparison of work related fatal injuries in the United States, Australia, and New Zealand: method and overall findings
Inj. Prev., March 1, 2001; 7(1): 22 - 28.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Inj. Prev.Home page
T. R Miller and G. M Waehrer
Costs of occupational injuries to teenagers, United States
Inj. Prev., September 1, 1998; 4(3): 211 - 217.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
Electrocutions in Construction Industry Involving Portable Metal Ladders--United States, 1984-1988
JAMA, April 15, 1992; 267(15): 2014 - 2014.
[PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the American Public Health Association