HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Submit a response View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (58) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Girgis, A Articles by Watson, A Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Girgis, A Articles by Watson, A

A workplace intervention for increasing outdoor workers' use of solar protection.

A Girgis, R W Sanson-Fisher and A Watson

New South Wales Cancer Council Cancer Education Research Project, University of Newcastle, Australia.

OBJECTIVES. Outdoor workers are at high risk of developing skin cancer. Primary prevention in this group can potentially reduce the incidence of skin cancer, and also potentiates the spontaneous remission of existing solar keratoses. A randomized controlled trial was conducted to evaluate a solar protection intervention targeting outdoor workers. METHODS. Outdoor workers were randomly allocated to an intervention (n = 65) or control group (n = 77). The intervention group received individual skin screening by a dermatologist and participated in an education session. Pre- and posttest outcome measures included solar protection behavior (assessed using a validated diary), knowledge, and attitudes. RESULTS. There was a significant increase (16%) in the percentage of outdoor workers who were using a high level of solar protection at posttest compared to pretest in the intervention group, but there was no change in the control group. Although both groups improved in their knowledge score, the intervention group showed a significantly greater improvement at posttest. No changes in attitudes were detected. CONCLUSIONS. The findings suggest that changes in solar protection are achievable with outdoor workers.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. A. Mayer, D. J. Slymen, E. J. Clapp, L. C. Pichon, L. Eckhardt, L. F. Eichenfield, J. P. Elder, J. F. Sallis, M. A. Weinstock, A. Achter, et al. Promoting Sun Safety Among US Postal Service Letter Carriers: Impact of a 2-Year Intervention Am J Public Health, March 1, 2007; 97(3): 559 - 565. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. L. Olson, C. Gaffney, P. Starr, J. J. Gibson, B. F. Cole, and A. J. Dietrich SunSafe in the Middle School Years: A Community-wide Intervention to Change Early-Adolescent Sun Protection Pediatrics, January 1, 2007; 119(1): e247 - e256. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. L. O'Riordan, K. B. Lunde, A. D. Steffen, and J. E. Maddock Validity of Beachgoers' Self-report of Their Sun Habits. Arch Dermatol, October 1, 2006; 142(10): 1304 - 1311. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. L. Yaroch, K. D. Reynolds, D. B. Buller, J. A. Maloy, and C. R. Geno Validity of a Sun Safety Diary Using UV Monitors in Middle School Children Health Educ Behav, June 1, 2006; 33(3): 340 - 351. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. E. Clowers-Webb, L. J. Christenson, P. K. Phillips, R. K. Roenigk, T. H. Nguyen, A. L. Weaver, and C. C. Otley Educational Outcomes Regarding Skin Cancer in Organ Transplant Recipients: Randomized Intervention of Intensive vs Standard Education. Arch Dermatol, June 1, 2006; 142(6): 712 - 718. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Burke, S. A. Sarpy, K. Smith-Crowe, S. Chan-Serafin, R. O. Salvador, and G. Islam Relative Effectiveness of Worker Safety and Health Training Methods Am J Public Health, February 1, 2006; 96(2): 315 - 324. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. B. Buller, P. A. Andersen, B. J. Walkosz, M. D. Scott, G. R. Cutter, M. B. Dignan, E. M. Zarlengo, J. H. Voeks, and A. J. Giese Randomized Trial Testing a Worksite Sun Protection Program in an Outdoor Recreation Industry Health Educ Behav, August 1, 2005; 32(4): 514 - 535. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. I. M. Mahler, J. A. Kulik, J. Harrell, A. Correa, F. X. Gibbons, and M. Gerrard Effects of UV Photographs, Photoaging Information, and Use of Sunless Tanning Lotion on Sun Protection Behaviors Arch Dermatol, March 1, 2005; 141(3): 373 - 380. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. R. Stanton, M. Janda, P. D. Baade, and P. Anderson Primary prevention of skin cancer: a review of sun protection in Australia and internationally Health Promot. Int., September 1, 2004; 19(3): 369 - 378. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Neale, G. Williams, and A. Green Application Patterns Among Participants Randomized to Daily Sunscreen Use in a Skin Cancer Prevention Trial Arch Dermatol, October 1, 2002; 138(10): 1319 - 1325. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Shani, E. Rachkovsky, A. Bahar-Fuchs, and L. Rosenberg The role of health education versus safety regulations in generating skin cancer preventive behavior among outdoor workers in Israel: an exploratory photosurvey Health Promot. Int., December 1, 2000; 15(4): 333 - 339. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. B. Buller and R. Borland Skin Cancer Prevention for Children: A Critical Review Health Educ Behav, June 1, 1999; 26(3): 317 - 343. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. H. Kaminester Current Concepts: Photoprotection Arch Fam Med, May 1, 1996; 5(5): 289 - 295. [Abstract] [PDF]