Advertisement
AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 85, Issue 10 1429-1431, Copyright © 1995 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow purchase articles
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Get other permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Segal, S P
Right arrow Articles by Goldfinger, S M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Segal, S P
Right arrow Articles by Goldfinger, S M
The quality of psychiatric emergency evaluations and patient outcomes in county hospitals.

S P Segal, L Egley, M A Watson and S M Goldfinger

Mental Health and Social Welfare Research Group, University of California, Berkeley 94720, USA.

Quality of care is widely assumed to be related to patient outcomes, but little is known about care in relation to outcomes in county general hospital psychiatric emergency services. It was hypothesized that conformity to professional standards (technical quality) and engagement of the patient (artful care) in psychiatric emergency services evaluations would contribute to improved patient functioning (Global Assessment Scale score) and appropriate disposition. A total of 583 cases in seven facilities were analyzed. Conformity to technical standards of care was associated with retention even after constraints, biases, and admission criteria had been taken into account. Conversely, artful care was associated with lower probability of retention and improved functioning.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Psychiatr. Serv.Home page
L. George, J. Durbin, T. Sheldon, and P. Goering
Patient and Contextual Factors Related to the Decision to Hospitalize Patients From Emergency Psychiatric Services
Psychiatr Serv, December 1, 2002; 53(12): 1586 - 1591.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychiatr. Serv.Home page
S. P. Segal, T. A. Laurie, and M. J. Segal
Factors in the Use of Coercive Retention in Civil Commitment Evaluations in Psychiatric Emergency Services
Psychiatr Serv, April 1, 2001; 52(4): 514 - 520.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychiatr. Serv.Home page
S. P. Segal, P. D. Akutsu, and M. A. Watson
Factors Associated With Involuntary Return to a Psychiatric Emergency Service Within 12 Months
Psychiatr Serv, September 1, 1998; 49(9): 1212 - 1217.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Public Health Association