HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Submit a response View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Nesbitt, T S Articles by Hart, L G Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Nesbitt, T S Articles by Hart, L G

Access to maternity care in rural Washington: its effect on neonatal outcomes and resource use.

T S Nesbitt, E H Larson, R A Rosenblatt and L G Hart

Department of Family Practice, University of California-Davis, Sacramento 95817, USA.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to ascertain the effects of poor local access to obstetric care on the risks of having a neonate diagnosed as non-normal, a long hospital stay, and/or high hospital charges. METHODS: Washington State birth certificates linked with hospital discharge abstracts of mothers and neonates were used to study 29809 births to residents of rural areas. Births to women from rural areas where more than two thirds of the women left for care were compared with births to women from rural areas where fewer than one third left for care. RESULTS: Poor local access to providers of obstetric care was associated with a significantly greater risk of having a non-normal neonate for both Medicaid and privately insured patients. However, poor local access to care was consistently associated with higher charges and increased hospital length of stay only if the patient was privately insured. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that local maternity services may help prevent non-normal births to rural women and, among privately insured women, might decrease use of neonatal resources.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. M. Dresden, L.-M. Baldwin, C. H. A. Andrilla, S. M. Skillman, and T. J. Benedetti Influence of Obstetric Practice on Workload and Practice Patterns of Family Physicians and Obstetrician-Gynecologists Ann. Fam. Med, January 1, 2008; 6(suppl_1): S5 - S11. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Aubrey-Bassler, S. Newbery, L. Kelly, B. Weaver, and S. Wilson Maternal outcomes of cesarean sections: Do generalists' patients have different outcomes than specialists' patients? Can Fam Physician, December 1, 2007; 53(12): 2132 - 2138. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Zelek, E. Orrantia, H. Poole, and J. Strike Home or away?: Factors affecting where women choose to give birth Can Fam Physician, January 1, 2007; 53(1): 78 - 83. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M E Abdel-Latif, B Bajuk, J Oei, T Vincent, L Sutton, K Lui, and on behalf of the Neonatal Intensive Care Units Gro Does rural or urban residence make a difference to neonatal outcome in premature birth? A regional study in Australia Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., July 1, 2006; 91(4): F251 - F256. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. S. Nesbitt, A. Hixon, J. L. Tanji, J. E. Scherger, and D. Abbott Risk Management in Obstetric Care for Family Physicians: Results of a 10-Year Project J Am Board Fam Med, November 1, 2003; 16(6): 471 - 477. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. C. Rosenthal and C. Fox Access to Health Care for the Rural Elderly JAMA, October 25, 2000; 284(16): 2034 - 2036. [Full Text] [PDF]