Neighbors for a smoke free north side: evaluation of a community organization approach to promoting smoking cessation among African Americans.
E B Fisher,
W F Auslander,
J F Munro,
C L Arfken,
R C Brownson and
N W Owens
Division of Health Behavior Research, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63108, USA. efisher@im.wustl.edu
OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated a community organization approachthat emphasized involvement of audiences in program planningand implementation in promoting nonsmoking among African Americanresidents of low-income neighborhoods. METHODS: The quasi-experimentaldesign involved a 24-month intervention in 3 low-income, predominantlyAfrican American neighborhoods in St. Louis. Intervention neighborhoodswere compared with comparable, untreated neighborhoods in KansasCity. RESULTS: The program was successful in engaging audiencemembers in its governance and in instigating numerous and diverseneighborhood activities to promote nonsmoking. The prevalenceof smoking declined from 34% to 27% in program neighborhoodsbut only from 34% to 33% in comparison neighborhoods. This differencewas apparent within all demographically defined subsamples,indicating that observed changes were consistent and not attributableto confounding by demographic characteristics. CONCLUSIONS:A community organization approach emphasizing local authorityfor program decisions and involvement of informal networks mayhave an appreciable impact on smoking among residents of low-income,African American neighborhoods.
This article has been cited by other articles:
S Michie, K Jochelson, W A Markham, and C Bridle Low-income groups and behaviour change interventions: a review of intervention content, effectiveness and theoretical frameworks
J Epidemiol Community Health,
August 1, 2009;
63(8):
610 - 622.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
V. Collie-Akers, J. A. Schultz, V. Carson, S. B. Fawcett, and M. Ronan REACH 2010: Kansas City, Missouri: Evaluating Mobilization Strategies With Neighborhood and Faith Organizations to Reduce Risk for Health Disparities
Health Promot Pract,
April 1, 2009;
10(2_suppl):
118S - 127S.
[Abstract][PDF]
J. H. Williams, W. F. Auslander, M. de Groot, A. D. Robinson, C. Houston, and D. Haire-Joshu Cultural Relevancy of a Diabetes Prevention Nutrition Program for African American Women
Health Promot Pract,
January 1, 2006;
7(1):
56 - 67.
[Abstract][PDF]
D. A. Dzewaltowski, P. A. Estabrooks, L. M. Klesges, S. Bull, and R. E. Glasgow Behavior change intervention research in community settings: how generalizable are the results?
Health Promot. Int.,
June 1, 2004;
19(2):
235 - 245.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
P. Peltomaki, M. Johansson, W. Ahrens, M. Sala, C. Wesseling, F. Brenes, C. Font, K. Husman, G. Janer, T. Kallas-Tarpila, et al. Social context for workplace health promotion: feasibility considerations in Costa Rica, Finland, Germany, Spain and Sweden
Health Promot. Int.,
June 1, 2003;
18(2):
115 - 126.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
C. Merzel and J. D'Afflitti Reconsidering Community-Based Health Promotion: Promise, Performance, and Potential
Am J Public Health,
April 1, 2003;
93(4):
557 - 574.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
S. L Mercer, L. W Green, A. C Rosenthal, C. G Husten, L. K. Khan, and W. H Dietz Possible lessons from the tobacco experience for obesity control
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition,
April 1, 2003;
77(4):
1073S - 1082.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
J. H. Williams, G. A. Belle, C. Houston, D. Haire-Joshu, and W. F. Auslander Process Evaluation Methods of a Peer-Delivered Health Promotion Program for African American Women
Health Promot Pract,
April 1, 2001;
2(2):
135 - 142.
[Abstract][PDF]
W. Sumner II, M. Dunaway, and D. G. Dillman II Cigarette Continuity Programs and Social Support for Smoking
Arch Fam Med,
June 1, 1998;
7(3):
264 - 268.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]