HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Submit a response View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Walsh, M M Articles by Ernster, V L Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Walsh, M M Articles by Ernster, V L

Smokeless tobacco cessation intervention for college athletes: results after 1 year.

M M Walsh, J F Hilton, C M Masouredis, L Gee, M A Chesney and V L Ernster

Department of Dental Public Health and Hygiene, University of California, San Francisco 94143-1361, USA.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of a college-based smokeless tobacco cessation intervention targeting college athletes. METHODS: Sixteen colleges were matched for prevalence of smokeless tobacco use in their combined baseball and football teams and randomly assigned within college pairs to the intervention or the control group. One-year prevalence of cessation among smokeless tobacco users was determined by self-report of abstinence for the previous 30 days. Differences between groups were analyzed in a weighted version of the Fisher 1-sided permutation test for paired samples after adjustment for significant predictors of quitting other than the intervention (i.e., smokeless tobacco uses per week and most frequently used brand). RESULTS: Cessation prevalences were 35% in the intervention colleges and 16% in the control colleges when subjects with unknown quit status were defined as nonquitters. After adjustment for other significant predictors of quitting, the difference of 19% increased to 21%. The intervention effect increased with level of smokeless tobacco use. CONCLUSIONS: This intervention was effective in promoting smokeless tobacco cessation, especially among those who were more frequent users.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. M. Walsh and J. A. Ellison Treatment of Tobacco Use and Dependence: The Role of the Dental Professional J Dent Educ., May 1, 2005; 69(5): 521 - 537. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. P. Varnell, D. M. Murray, J. B. Janega, and J. L. Blitstein Design and Analysis of Group-Randomized Trials: A Review of Recent Practices Am J Public Health, March 1, 2004; 94(3): 393 - 399. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R C Stotts, P K Roberson, E Y Hanna, S K Jones, and C K Smith A randomised clinical trial of nicotine patches for treatment of spit tobacco addiction among adolescents Tob. Control, December 1, 2003; 12(90004): iv11 - 15. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Xiangyang, Z. Lan, M. Xueping, Z. Tao, S. Yuzhen, and M. Jagusztyn Beijing health promoting universities: practice and evaluation Health Promot. Int., June 1, 2003; 18(2): 107 - 113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. M. Ling and S. A. Glantz Why and How the Tobacco Industry Sells Cigarettes to Young Adults: Evidence From Industry Documents Am J Public Health, June 1, 2002; 92(6): 908 - 916. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. L. TOMAR Dentistry's role in tobacco control J Am Dent Assoc, November 1, 2001; 132(suppl_1): 30S - 35S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. M Walsh, J. Ellison, J. F Hilton, M. Chesney, and V. L Ernster Spit (smokeless) tobacco use by high school baseball athletes in California Tob. Control, June 1, 2000; 9 (2009): ii32 - ii39. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]