Advertisement
AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 89, Issue 7 1097-1100, Copyright © 1999 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow purchase articles
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Get other permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Woods, W J
Right arrow Articles by Rinaldi, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Woods, W J
Right arrow Articles by Rinaldi, J
Name-based reporting of HIV-positive test results as a deterrent to testing.

W J Woods, J W Dilley, T Lihatsh, J Sabatino, B Adler and J Rinaldi

University of California San Francisco, Center for AIDS Prevention Studies 94105, USA. bwoods@psg.ucsf.edu

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated attitudes toward name-based reporting of HIV. METHODS: One hundred thirty high-risk, male repeat testers received information on the public health benefits of name-based reporting and reported their intentions to test. RESULTS: Of the 67 men who were randomly selected and asked their intentions before hearing the benefits, 63% said they would not test if reporting were required. After hearing the benefits, 19% changed their minds (P < .014). Of the 63 men who were asked only after hearing the benefits, 44% would not test. CONCLUSIONS: Implementing name-based reporting without working before-hand to change attitudes could undermine the benefits of both testing and HIV surveillance.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nurs EthicsHome page
A. S Muula and J. M Mfutso-Bengo
Important but Neglected Ethical and Cultural Considerations in the Fight Against HIV/AIDS in Malawi
Nursing Ethics, September 1, 2004; 11(5): 479 - 488.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
G. C. Jayaraman, J. K. Preiksaitis, and B. Larke
Mandatory reporting of HIV infection and opt-out prenatal screening for HIV infection: effect on testing rates
Can. Med. Assoc. J., March 18, 2003; 168(6): 679 - 682.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AJPHHome page
J. D. Fortenberry, M. McFarlane, A. Bleakley, S. Bull, M. Fishbein, D. M. Grimley, C. K. Malotte, and B. P. Stoner
Relationships of Stigma and Shame to Gonorrhea and HIV Screening
Am J Public Health, March 1, 2002; 92(3): 378 - 381.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American Public Health Association