Name-based reporting of HIV-positive test results as a deterrent to testing.
W J Woods,
J W Dilley,
T Lihatsh,
J Sabatino,
B Adler and
J Rinaldi
University of California San Francisco, Center for AIDS Prevention Studies 94105, USA. bwoods@psg.ucsf.edu
OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated attitudes toward name-basedreporting of HIV. METHODS: One hundred thirty high-risk, malerepeat testers received information on the public health benefitsof name-based reporting and reported their intentions to test.RESULTS: Of the 67 men who were randomly selected and askedtheir intentions before hearing the benefits, 63% said theywould not test if reporting were required. After hearing thebenefits, 19% changed their minds (P < .014). Of the 63 menwho were asked only after hearing the benefits, 44% would nottest. CONCLUSIONS: Implementing name-based reporting withoutworking before-hand to change attitudes could undermine thebenefits of both testing and HIV surveillance.
This article has been cited by other articles:
A. S Muula and J. M Mfutso-Bengo Important but Neglected Ethical and Cultural Considerations in the Fight Against HIV/AIDS in Malawi
Nursing Ethics,
September 1, 2004;
11(5):
479 - 488.
[Abstract][PDF]
G. C. Jayaraman, J. K. Preiksaitis, and B. Larke Mandatory reporting of HIV infection and opt-out prenatal screening for HIV infection: effect on testing rates
Can. Med. Assoc. J.,
March 18, 2003;
168(6):
679 - 682.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
J. D. Fortenberry, M. McFarlane, A. Bleakley, S. Bull, M. Fishbein, D. M. Grimley, C. K. Malotte, and B. P. Stoner Relationships of Stigma and Shame to Gonorrhea and HIV Screening
Am J Public Health,
March 1, 2002;
92(3):
378 - 381.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]