Advertisement
AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow purchase articles
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Get other permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Umbach, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Umbach, D. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Birth Outcomes
Right arrow Other Statistics/Evaluation/Research

American Journal of Public Health, Vol 90, Issue 1 127-129, Copyright © 2000 by American Public Health Association


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Unit conversion as a source of misclassification in US birthweight data

DM Umbach
Biostatistics Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA. umbach@niehs.nih.gov

OBJECTIVES: This study explains why frequency polygons for US birthweights in 100-g weight classes appear spiky compared with their European counterparts. METHODS: A probability model is used to describe how unit conversion can induce misclassification. Birthweights from the United States and Norway are used to illustrate that misclassification operates in grouped US data. RESULTS: Spikiness represents misclassification that arises when measured birthweights are rounded to the nearer ounce, converted to grams, and then grouped into weight classes. Misclassification is ameliorated, not eliminated, with 200-g weight classes. CONCLUSIONS: Possible biases from misclassification should be carefully evaluated when fitting statistical models to grouped US birthweights.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the American Public Health Association