Advertisement
AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow purchase articles
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Get other permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tomes, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tomes, N.
Related Collections
Right arrow Epidemiology
Right arrow Other Infections
Right arrow Media
Right arrow History

American Journal of Public Health, Vol 90, Issue 2 191-198, Copyright © 2000 by American Public Health Association

JOURNAL ARTICLE

The making of a germ panic, then and now

N Tomes
Department of History at SUNY at Stony Brook 11794-4348, USA. ntomes@notes.cc.sunysb.edu

Over the last 2 decades, a heightened interest in germs has been evident in many aspects of American popular culture, including news coverage, advertisements, and entertainment media. Although clearly a response to the AIDS epidemic and other recent disease outbreaks, current obsessions with germs have some striking parallels with a similar period of intense anxiety about disease germs that occurred between 1900 and 1940. A comparison of these 2 periods of germ "panic" suggests some of the long-term cultural trends that contributed to their making. Both germ panics reflected anxieties about societal incorporation, associated with expanding markets, transportation networks, and mass immigration. They were also shaped by new trends in public health education, journalism, advertising, and entertainment media. In comparison to the first germ panic, the current discourse about the "revenge of the superbugs" is considerably more pessimistic because of increasing worries about the environment, suspicions of governmental authority, and distrust of expert knowledge. Yet, as popular anxieties about infectious disease have increased, public health scientists have been attracting favorable coverage in their role as "medical detectives" on the trail of the "killer germ."


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Nurs EthicsHome page
H.-M. Tzeng and C.-Y. Yin
Learning to Respect a Patient's Spiritual Needs Concerning an Unknown Infectious Disease
Nursing Ethics, January 1, 2006; 13(1): 17 - 28.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
E. Fee and T. M. Brown
The Unfulfilled Promise Of Public Health: Deja Vu All Over Again
Health Aff., November 1, 2002; 21(6): 31 - 43.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 AJPHHome page
K. Knowlton
Urban History, Urban Health
Am J Public Health, December 1, 2001; 91(12): 1944 - 1946.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the American Public Health Association