The authors are with the Lowell Center for Sustainable Production, Department of Work Environment, University of Massachusetts, Lowell.
Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to David Kriebel, ScD, Department of Work Environment, University of Massachusetts Lowell, 1 University Ave, Lowell, MA 01854 (e-mail: david_kriebel{at}uml.edu).
The precautionary principle has provoked a spirited debate amongenvironmentalists worldwide, but it is equally relevant to publichealth and shares much with primary prevention. Its centralcomponents are (1) taking preventive action in the face of uncertainty;(2) shifting the burden of proof to the proponents of an activity;(3) exploring a wide range of alternatives to possibly harmfulactions; and (4) increasing public participation in decisionmaking.
Precaution is relevant to public health, because it can helpto prevent unintended consequences of well-intentioned publichealth interventions by ensuring a more thorough assessmentof the problems and proposed solutions. It can also be a positiveforce for change. Three aspects are stressed: promoting thesearch for safer technologies, encouraging greater democracyand openness in public health policy, and stimulating reevaluationof the methods of public health science.
This article has been cited by other articles:
D. Kriebel The reactionary principle: inaction for public health
Occup. Environ. Med.,
September 1, 2007;
64(9):
573 - 574.
[Full Text][PDF]
G. Rezza The principle of precaution-based prevention: a Popperian paradox?
Eur J Public Health,
December 1, 2006;
16(6):
576 - 577.
[Full Text][PDF]
G. Thomson, N. Wilson, and P. Howden-Chapman Population level policy options for increasing the prevalence of smokefree homes.
J Epidemiol Community Health,
April 1, 2006;
60(4):
298 - 304.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
C. Monforton Weight of the Evidence or Wait for the Evidence? Protecting Underground Miners From Diesel Particulate Matter
Am J Public Health,
February 1, 2006;
96(2):
271 - 276.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
N. Krieger, I. Lowy, R. Aronowitz, J. Bigby, K. Dickersin, E. Garner, J.-P. Gaudilliere, C. Hinestrosa, R. Hubbard, P. A Johnson, et al. Hormone replacement therapy, cancer, controversies, and women's health: historical, epidemiological, biological, clinical, and advocacy perspectives
J Epidemiol Community Health,
September 1, 2005;
59(9):
740 - 748.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
P. J. Hoppin and R. Clapp Science and Regulation: Current Impasse and Future Solutions
Am J Public Health,
July 1, 2005;
95(S1):
S8 - S12.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
J. A Tickner, D. Kriebel, and S. Wright A compass for health: rethinking precaution and its role in science and public health
Int. J. Epidemiol.,
August 1, 2003;
32(4):
489 - 492.
[Full Text][PDF]
I B Pless Expanding the precautionary principle
Inj. Prev.,
March 1, 2003;
9(1):
1 - 2.
[Full Text][PDF]
R E McKeown and D L Weed Ethics in epidemiology and public health II. Applied terms
J Epidemiol Community Health,
October 1, 2002;
56(10):
739 - 741.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
R. Morello-Frosch, M. Pastor JR, and J. Sadd Integrating Environmental Justice and the Precautionary Principle in Research and Policy Making: The Case of Ambient Air Toxics Exposures and Health Risks among Schoolchildren in Los Angeles
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,
January 1, 2002;
584(1):
47 - 68.
[Abstract][PDF]
J. A. Tickner The Precautionary Principle and Public Health Trade-Offs: Case Study of West Nile Virus
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,
January 1, 2002;
584(1):
69 - 79.
[Abstract][PDF]
B. D. Goldstein The Precautionary Principle Also Applies to Public Health Actions
Am J Public Health,
September 1, 2001;
91(9):
1358 - 1361.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]