HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Goldstein, B. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Goldstein, B. D. Related Collections Hepatitis Prevention Other Environment

Bernard D. Goldstein, MD

Bernard D. Goldstein is with the University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, Pa.

Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Bernard D. Goldstein, MD, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, 130 DeSoto St, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 (e-mail: bdgold{at}pitt.edu).

The precautionary principle asserts that the burden of proof for potentially harmful actions by industry or government rests on the assurance of safety and that when there are threats of serious damage, scientific uncertainty must be resolved in favor of prevention. Yet we in public health are sometimes guilty of not adhering to this principle.

Examples of actions with unintended negative consequences include the addition of methyl tert-butyl ether to gasoline in the United States to decrease air pollution, the drilling of tube wells in Bangladesh to avoid surface water microbial contamination, and villagewide parenteral antischistosomiasis therapy in Egypt. Each of these actions had unintended negative consequences. Lessons include the importance of multidisciplinary approaches to public health and the value of risk–benefit analysis, of public health surveillance, and of a functioning tort system—all of which contribute to effective precautionary approaches.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. M. Schilling and R. P. Dellavalle Dealing With Unanticipated Mortality in a Large Randomized Clinical Trial of Topical Tretinoin Arch Dermatol, January 1, 2009; 145(1): 76 - 76. [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. D Goldstein Problems in applying the precautionary principle to public health Occup. Environ. Med., September 1, 2007; 64(9): 571 - 574. [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. W. Stewart and A. S. Coates Cancer Prevention: A Global Perspective J. Clin. Oncol., January 10, 2005; 23(2): 392 - 403. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. A. Offit and R. K. Jew Addressing Parents' Concerns: Do Vaccines Contain Harmful Preservatives, Adjuvants, Additives, or Residuals? Pediatrics, December 1, 2003; 112(6): 1394 - 1397. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A Tickner, D. Kriebel, and S. Wright A compass for health: rethinking precaution and its role in science and public health Int. J. Epidemiol., August 1, 2003; 32(4): 489 - 492. [Full Text] [PDF]

				I B Pless Expanding the precautionary principle Inj. Prev., March 1, 2003; 9(1): 1 - 2. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Tickner The Precautionary Principle and Public Health Trade-Offs: Case Study of West Nile Virus The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, January 1, 2002; 584(1): 69 - 79. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Kriebel and J. Tickner Reenergizing Public Health Through Precaution Am J Public Health, September 1, 2001; 91(9): 1351 - 1355. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]