Avoiding the Boomerang: Testing the Relative Effectiveness of Antidrug Public Service Announcements Before a National Campaign
Martin Fishbein, PhD,
Kathleen Hall-Jamieson, PhD,
Eric Zimmer, PhD,
Ina von Haeften, PhD and
Robin Nabi, PhD
Martin Fishbein, Kathleen Hall-Jamieson, Eric Zimmer, and Ina von Haeften are with the Annenberg Public Policy Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. Robin Nabi is with the Department of Communication, University of Arizona at Tucson.
Correspondence: Request for reprints should be sent to Martin Fishbein, PhD, Annenberg Public Policy Center, University of Pennsylvania, 3620 Walnut St, Philadelphia, PA 19104 (email: mfishbein{at}asc.upenn.edu).
Objectives. This study examined the relative perceived effectivenessof 30 antidrug public service announcements (PSAs) and assessedthe extent to which judgments of effectiveness are related tojudgments of realism, amount learned, and positive and negativeemotional responses.
Methods. Data were obtained from 3608 students in grades 5 through12 in 10 schools. The ethnically diverse sample was 50.8% male.Students in 5 experimental conditions viewed sets of 6 antidrugPSAs and filled out a brief evaluation questionnaire followingeach PSA. Those in the control condition viewed a nondrug-relatedtelevision program.
Results. The relative perceived effectiveness of the 30 PSAsvaried considerably. Sixteen were rated as significantly moreeffective, and 6 as significantly less effective, than the controlprogram. Relative rated effectiveness was highly related torealism (r = .87), amount learned (r = .88), negative emotion(r = .87), and positive emotion (r = .35).
Conclusions. Evaluative research is necessary to prevent broadcastof PSAs that could have a negative impact. PSAs should pointout the negative consequences of drug use behavior rather thantelling adolescents to "just say no."
This article has been cited by other articles:
A. A. Strasser, J. N. Cappella, C. Jepson, M. Fishbein, K. Z. Tang, E. Han, and C. Lerman Experimental evaluation of antitobacco PSAs: Effects of message content and format on physiological and behavioral outcomes
Nicotine Tob Res,
March 1, 2009;
11(3):
293 - 302.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
J. R. D. Whittingham, R. A. C. Ruiter, D. Castermans, A. Huiberts, and G. Kok Designing effective health education materials: experimental pre-testing of a theory-based brochure to increase knowledge
Health Educ. Res.,
June 1, 2008;
23(3):
414 - 426.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
H. Cho and F. J. Boster First and Third Person Perceptions on Anti-Drug Ads Among Adolescents
Communication Research,
April 1, 2008;
35(2):
169 - 189.
[Abstract][PDF]
H.-J. Paek and A. C. Gunther How Peer Proximity Moderates Indirect Media Influence on Adolescent Smoking
Communication Research,
August 1, 2007;
34(4):
407 - 432.
[Abstract][PDF]
L Henriksen, A L Dauphinee, Y Wang, and S P Fortmann Industry sponsored anti-smoking ads and adolescent reactance: test of a boomerang effect
Tob. Control,
February 1, 2006;
15(1):
13 - 18.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
C. Segrin Communication and the Study of Personal Well-Being
International Communication Gazette,
December 1, 2005;
67(6):
547 - 549.
[PDF]
S. H. Kelder, C. Pechmann, M. D. Slater, J. K. Worden, and A. Levitt THE NATIONAL YOUTH ANTI-DRUG MEDIA CAMPAIGN
Am J Public Health,
August 1, 2002;
92(8):
1211 - 1212.
[Full Text][PDF]