Clean Indoor Air: Advances in California, 19901999
Elizabeth A. Gilpin, MS,
Arthur J. Farkas, PhD,
Sherry L. Emery, PhD,
Christopher F. Ake, PhD and
John P. Pierce, PhD
The authors are with the Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, Calif.
Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to John P. Pierce, PhD, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0645 (e-mail: jppierce{at}ucsd.edu).
Objectives. This study assessed progress in achieving cleanindoor air in California.
Methods. Data were from large, cross-sectional population-basedsurveys (19901999).
Results. Indoor workers reporting smoke-free workplaces increasedfrom 35.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 33.7, 36.3) in 1990to 93.4% (95% CI = 92.6, 94.2) in 1999. Exposure of nonsmokingindoor workers to secondhand tobacco smoke decreased from 29.0%(95% CI = 27.2, 30.8) to 15.6% (95% CI = 14.1, 17.1). Adultswith smoke-free homes increased from 37.6 % (95% CI = 35.1,40.1) in 1992 to 73.7% (95% CI = 73.2, 74.2) in 1999; nearlyhalf of smokers in 1999 had smoke-free homes. In 1999, 82.2%(95% CI = 81.5, 82.9) of children and adolescents (017years) had smoke-free homes, up from 38.0% (95% CI = 35.1, 40.9)in 1992.
Conclusions. California's advances highlight an important opportunityfor tobacco control.
This article has been cited by other articles:
S C Hill and L Liang Smoking in the home and children's health
Tob. Control,
February 1, 2008;
17(1):
32 - 37.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
C. L Schmitt, A. M Malarcher, P. I Clark, J. M Bombard, W. Strauss, and F. A Stillman Community guide recommendations and state level tobacco control programmes: 1999 2004
Tob. Control,
October 1, 2007;
16(5):
318 - 324.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
R. Phillips, A. Amos, D. Ritchie, S. Cunningham-Burley, and C. Martin Smoking in the home after the smoke-free legislation in Scotland: qualitative study
BMJ,
September 15, 2007;
335(7619):
553 - 553.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
G. Thomson, N. Wilson, and P. Howden-Chapman Population level policy options for increasing the prevalence of smokefree homes.
J Epidemiol Community Health,
April 1, 2006;
60(4):
298 - 304.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
L. W. Greathouse, E. J. Hahn, C. T. C. Okoli, T. A. Warnick, and C. A. Riker Passing a Smoke-Free Law in a Pro-Tobacco Culture: A Multiple Streams Approach
Policy Politics Nursing Practice,
August 1, 2005;
6(3):
211 - 220.
[Abstract][PDF]
J P Pierce, M M White, and E A Gilpin Adolescent smoking decline during California's tobacco control programme
Tob. Control,
June 1, 2005;
14(3):
207 - 212.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
B. W. Stewart and A. S. Coates Cancer Prevention: A Global Perspective
J. Clin. Oncol.,
January 10, 2005;
23(2):
392 - 403.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
E A Gilpin, L Lee, and J P Pierce Changes in population attitudes about where smoking should not be allowed: California versus the rest of the USA
Tob. Control,
March 1, 2004;
13(1):
38 - 44.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
E A Gilpin, L Lee, J P Pierce, H Tang, and J Lloyd Support for protection from secondhand smoke: California 2002
Tob. Control,
March 1, 2004;
13(1):
96 - 96.
[Full Text][PDF]
D Hennrikus, P R Pentel, and S D Sandell Preferences and practices among renters regarding smoking restrictions in apartment buildings
Tob. Control,
June 1, 2003;
12(2):
189 - 194.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
M. E. Northridge, G. N. Stover, J. E. Rosenthal, and D. Sherard Environmental Equity and Health: Understanding Complexity and Moving Forward
Am J Public Health,
February 1, 2003;
93(2):
209 - 214.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]