|
 |
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
© 2002 American Public Health Association
RESEARCH AND PRACTICE |
DeAnn Lazovich is with the Division of Epidemiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. David L. Parker, Lisa M. Brosseau, and Siobhan K. Dugan are with the Division of Environmental and Occupational Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. Wei Pan and Lynette Hock are with the Division of Biostatistics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. F. Thomas Milton is with the Department of Wood and Paper Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. David L. Parker and Siobhan K. Dugan are with the Chronic Disease and Environmental Epidemiology Section, Minnesota Department of Health, Minneapolis.
Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to DeAnn Lazovich, PhD, Division of Epidemiology, University of Minnesota, 1300 S 2nd St, #300, Minneapolis, MN 55454 (e-mail: lazovich{at}epi.umn.edu).
Objectives. This study assessed the effectiveness of an intervention to reduce wood dust, a carcinogen, by approximately 26% in small woodworking businesses.
Methods. We randomized 48 businesses to an intervention (written recommendations, technical assistance, and worker training) or comparison (written recommendations alone) condition. Changes from baseline in dust concentration, dust control methods, and worker behavior were compared between the groups 1 year later.
Results. At follow-up, workers in intervention relative to comparison businesses reported greater awareness, increases in stage of readiness, and behavioral changes consistent with dust control. The median dust concentration change in the intervention group from baseline to follow-up was 10.4% (95% confidence interval = –28.8%, 12.7%) lower than the change in comparison businesses.
Conclusions. We attribute the smaller-than-expected reduction in wood dust to the challenge of conducting rigorous intervention effectiveness research in occupational settings.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  T Meijster, E Tielemans, and D Heederik Effect of an intervention aimed at reducing the risk of allergic respiratory disease in bakers: change in flour dust and fungal alpha-amylase levels Occup. Environ. Med., August 1, 2009; 66(8): 543 - 549. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Meijster, E. Tielemans, J. Schinkel, and D. Heederik Evaluation of Peak Exposures in the Dutch Flour Processing Industry: Implications for Intervention Strategies Ann. Hyg., October 1, 2008; 52(7): 587 - 596. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. Fransman, J. Schinkel, T. Meijster, J. Van Hemmen, E. Tielemans, and H. Goede Development and Evaluation of an Exposure Control Efficacy Library (ECEL) Ann. Hyg., October 1, 2008; 52(7): 567 - 575. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. M. Murray, S. L. Pals, J. L. Blitstein, C. M. Alfano, and J. Lehman Design and Analysis of Group-Randomized Trials in Cancer: A Review of Current Practices J Natl Cancer Inst, April 2, 2008; 100(7): 483 - 491. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. MEIJSTER, E. TIELEMANS, N. D. PATER, and D. Heederik Modelling Exposure in Flour Processing Sectors in The Netherlands: a Baseline Measurement in the Context of an Intervention Program Ann. Hyg., April 1, 2007; 51(3): 293 - 304. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T Meijster, W Fransman, J van Hemmen, H Kromhout, D Heederik, and E Tielemans A probabilistic assessment of the impact of interventions on oncology nurses' exposure to antineoplastic agents Occup. Environ. Med., August 1, 2006; 63(8): 530 - 537. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. P. Varnell, D. M. Murray, J. B. Janega, and J. L. Blitstein Design and Analysis of Group-Randomized Trials: A Review of Recent Practices Am J Public Health, March 1, 2004; 94(3): 393 - 399. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |