Advertisement
AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow purchase articles
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Get other permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (15)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brown, L. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brown, L. D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Global Health
Right arrow Health Administration
Right arrow Insurance
Right arrow Health Policy
Right arrow Access to Care
Right arrow Government
January 2003, Vol 93, No. 1 | American Journal of Public Health 52-56
© 2003 American Public Health Association

PUBLIC HEALTH MATTERS

Comparing Health Systems in Four Countries: Lessons for the United States

Lawrence D. Brown

The author is with the Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY.

Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Lawrence D. Brown, Professor of Health Policy and Management, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 600 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032 (e-mail: ldb3{at}columbia.edu).

The Rekindling Reform initiative examined the health systems of 4 countries: Canada, France, Germany, and Great Britain (United Kingdom). From the 4 country reports published in this issue of the American Journal of Public Health, 10 crosscutting themes emerge: (1) coverage, (2) funding, (3) costs, (4) providers, (5) integration, (6) markets, (7) analysis, (8) supply, (9) satisfaction, and (10) leadership. Lessons for the United States are presented under each point.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 JRSMHome page
A. G Mainous III, V. A Diaz, S. Saxena, R. Baker, C. J Everett, R. J Koopman, and A. Majeed
Diabetes management in the USA and England: comparative analysis of national surveys
J R Soc Med, September 1, 2006; 99(9): 463 - 469.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch Intern MedHome page
T. H. Gallagher, A. D. Waterman, J. M. Garbutt, J. M. Kapp, D. K. Chan, W. C. Dunagan, V. J. Fraser, and W. Levinson
US and Canadian Physicians' Attitudes and Experiences Regarding Disclosing Errors to Patients.
Arch Intern Med, August 14, 2006; 166(15): 1605 - 1611.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
M. K. Gusmano, V. G. Rodwin, and D. Weisz
A new way to compare health systems: avoidable hospital conditions in Manhattan and paris.
Health Aff., March 1, 2006; 25(2): 510 - 520.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 AJPHHome page
A. E. Yamin
The Right to Health Under International Law and Its Relevance to the United States
Am J Public Health, July 1, 2005; 95(7): 1156 - 1161.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 AJPHHome page
M. N. Akhter
APHA Policies on Universal Health Care: Health for a Few or Health for All?
Am J Public Health, January 1, 2003; 93(1): 99 - 101.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Public Health Association