HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (5) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Andersen, B. S. Articles by Lawson, C. B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Andersen, B. S. Articles by Lawson, C. B. Related Collections Community Health Smoking Cessation Cancer Tobacco Control

Brent S. Andersen, PhD, Michael E. Begay, PhD and Cecil B. Lawson, MA

Brent S. Andersen and Michael E. Begay are with the Department of Community Health Studies, School of Public Health and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts at Amherst. Cecil B. Lawson is with the Department of Political Science, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Michael E. Begay, PhD, Department of Community Health Studies, School of Public Health and Health Sciences, Arnold House, 715 N Pleasant St, Amherst, MA 01003-9304 (e-mail: begay{at}schoolph.umass.edu).

Objectives. We describe the tobacco industry’s effort in Massachusetts to block the adoption of local regulations designed to reduce youth access to tobacco products. We also explain how state-funded tobacco control advocates overcame industry opposition.

Methods. We examined internal tobacco industry documents and records of local boards of health and conducted interviews with participants in local regulatory debates.

Results. The industry fought proposed regulations by working through a trade group, the New England Convenience Store Association. With industry direction and financing, the association’s members argued against proposed regulations in local public hearings. However, these efforts failed because community-based advocates worked assiduously to cultivate support for the regulations among board of health members and local community organizations.

Conclusions. Passage of youth access regulations by local boards of health in Massachusetts is attributed to ongoing state funding for local tobacco control initiatives, agreement on common policy goals among tobacco control advocates, and a strategy of persuading boards of health to adopt and enforce their own local regulations.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. T. Botello-Harbaum, D. L. Haynie, R. J. Iannotti, J. Wang, L. Gase, and B. Simons-Morton Tobacco control policy and adolescent cigarette smoking status in the United States Nicotine Tob Res, July 1, 2009; 11(7): 875 - 885. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Carver, B. Reinert, and L. M. Range Sustaining Tobacco Control Coalitions Amid Declining Resources Health Promot Pract, July 1, 2007; 8(3): 292 - 298. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Wakefield, K. McLeod, and C. L Perry "Stay away from them until you're old enough to make a decision": tobacco company testimony about youth smoking initiation Tob. Control, December 1, 2006; 15(suppl_4): iv44 - iv53. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]