Tobacco Industry Efforts to Defeat the Occupational Safety and Health Administration Indoor Air Quality Rule
Katherine Bryan-Jones and
Lisa A. Bero, PhD
Katherine Bryan-Jones and Lisa A. Bero are with the Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California San Francisco.
Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Lisa A. Bero, PhD, Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Institute for Health Policy Studies, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California, Box 1390, San Francisco, CA 941431390 (e-mail:bero{at}medicine.ucsf.edu).
Objectives. We describe tobacco industry strategies to defeatthe Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) IndoorAir Quality rule and the implementation of those strategies.
Methods. We analyzed tobacco industry documents, public commentaryon, and media coverage of the OSHA rule.
Results. The tobacco industry had 5 strategies: (1) maintainscientific debate about the basis of the rule, (2) delay deliberationon the rule, (3) redefine the scope of the rule, (4) recruitand assist labor and business organizations in opposing therule, and (5) increase media coverage of the tobacco industryposition. The tobacco industry successfully implemented all5 strategies.
Conclusions. Our findings suggest that regulatory authoritiesmust take into account the source, motivation, and validityof arguments used in the regulatory process in order to makeaccurately informed decisions.
This article has been cited by other articles:
D. Best, Committee on Environmental Health, Committee on Native American Child Health, and Committee on Adolescence Secondhand and Prenatal Tobacco Smoke Exposure
Pediatrics,
November 1, 2009;
124(5):
e1017 - e1044.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
D. M. Cook and L. A. Bero The Politics of Smoking in Federal Buildings: An Executive Order Case Study
Am J Public Health,
September 1, 2009;
99(9):
1588 - 1595.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
A. Landman and S. A. Glantz Tobacco Industry Efforts to Undermine Policy-Relevant Research
Am J Public Health,
January 1, 2009;
99(1):
45 - 58.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
E. K. Tong and S. A. Glantz Tobacco Industry Efforts Undermining Evidence Linking Secondhand Smoke With Cardiovascular Disease
Circulation,
October 16, 2007;
116(16):
1845 - 1854.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
P. Lopipero and L. A Bero Tobacco interests or the public interest: 20 years of industry strategies to undermine airline smoking restrictions.
Tob. Control,
August 1, 2006;
15(4):
323 - 332.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
E D Balbach and E M Barbeau Beyond quagmires: the evolving quality of documents research
Tob. Control,
December 1, 2005;
14(6):
361 - 362.
[Full Text][PDF]
S M Carter Tobacco document research reporting
Tob. Control,
December 1, 2005;
14(6):
368 - 376.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
E M Barbeau, G Kelder, S Ahmed, V Mantuefel, and E D Balbach From strange bedfellows to natural allies: the shifting allegiance of fire service organisations in the push for federal fire-safe cigarette legislation
Tob. Control,
October 1, 2005;
14(5):
338 - 345.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
D. M. Cook, E. K. Tong, S. A. Glantz, and L. A. Bero The Power Of Paperwork: How Philip Morris Neutralized The Medical Code For Secondhand Smoke
Health Aff.,
July 1, 2005;
24(4):
994 - 1004.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
L L Mandel and S A Glantz Hedging their bets: tobacco and gambling industries work against smoke-free policies
Tob. Control,
September 1, 2004;
13(3):
268 - 276.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
J Drope, S A Bialous, and S A Glantz Tobacco industry efforts to present ventilation as an alternative to smoke-free environments in North America
Tob. Control,
March 1, 2004;
13(90001):
i41 - 47.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
S. A. Schroeder Tobacco Control in the Wake of the 1998 Master Settlement Agreement
N. Engl. J. Med.,
January 15, 2004;
350(3):
293 - 301.
[Full Text][PDF]