HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (18) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Quinn, S. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Quinn, S. C. Related Collections Community Health Ethics Human Rights

Sandra Crouse Quinn, PhD

The author is with the Department of Behavioral and Community Health Sciences, Graduate School of Public Health at the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa.

Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Sandra Quinn, PhD, 230 Parran Hall, 130 Desoto St, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 (e-mail: squinn{at}pitt.edu).

Increasingly, researchers grapple with meaningful efforts to involve communities in research, recognizing that communities are distinct from individuals. We also struggle to ensure that individual participants in research are fully protected.

Community advisory boards (CABs) offer an opportunity to adopt a relationships paradigm that enables researchers to anticipate and address the context in which communities understand risks and benefits, and individuals give consent.

CABs provide a mechanism for community consultation that contributes to protecting communities and fostering meaningful research. Furthermore, CABs can help us to re-create informed consent as a process. It is critical that we conduct research to understand the role of CABs in the informed consent process.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. R. Hyatt, D. M. Gute, A. Pirie, H. Page, I. Vasquez, and F. Dalembert Transferring Knowledge About Human Subjects Protections and the Role of Institutional Review Boards in a Community-Based Participatory Research Project Am J Public Health, November 1, 2009; 99(S3): S526 - S531. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. M. McGrath, R. E. Fullilove, M. R. Kaufman, R. Wallace, and M. T. Fullilove The Limits of Collaboration: A Qualitative Study of Community Ethical Review of Environmental Health Research Am J Public Health, August 1, 2009; 99(8): 1510 - 1514. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Rajakumar, S. B. Thomas, D. Musa, D. Almario, and M. A. Garza Racial Differences in Parents' Distrust of Medicine and Research Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, February 1, 2009; 163(2): 108 - 114. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. F Morin, S. Morfit, A. Maiorana, A. Aramrattana, P. Goicochea, J. M. Mutsambi, J. L. Robbins, and T A. Richards Building community partnerships: case studies of Community Advisory Boards at research sites in Peru, Zimbabwe, and Thailand Clinical Trials, April 1, 2008; 5(2): 147 - 156. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. N. Vaslef, C. B. Cairns, and J. M. Falletta Ethical and Regulatory Challenges Associated With the Exception From Informed Consent Requirements for Emergency Research: From Experimental Design to Institutional Review Board Approval Arch Surg, October 1, 2006; 141(10): 1019 - 1023. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. J. Silvestre, J. B. Hylton, L. M. Johnson, C. Houston, M. Witt, L. Jacobson, and D. Ostrow Recruiting Minority Men Who Have Sex With Men for HIV Research: Results From a 4-City Campaign Am J Public Health, June 1, 2006; 96(6): 1020 - 1027. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Dickert and J. Sugarman Ethical Goals of Community Consultation in Research Am J Public Health, July 1, 2005; 95(7): 1123 - 1127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. M. MacQueen and J. W. Buehler MACQUEEN AND BUEHLER RESPOND Am J Public Health, November 1, 2004; 94(11): 1841 - 1842. [Full Text] [PDF]