HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (8) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sorenson, S. B. Articles by Wiebe, D. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Sorenson, S. B. Articles by Wiebe, D. J. Related Collections Family Health Health Policy Injury/Emergency Care/Violence Prevention Women's Health

Susan B. Sorenson, PhD and Douglas J. Wiebe, PhD

Susan B. Sorenson is with the School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles. At the time of the study, Douglas J. Wiebe was with the School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles.

Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Susan B. Sorenson, PhD, UCLA School of Public Health, 650 Young Dr S, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1772 (e-mail: sorenson{at}ucla.edu).

Objectives. We assessed weapon use in intimate partner violence and perspectives on hypothetical firearm policies.

Methods. We conducted structured in-person interviews with 417 women in 67 battered women’s shelters.

Results. Words, hands/fists, and feet were the most common weapons used against and by battered women. About one third of the battered women had a firearm in the home. In two thirds of these households, the intimate partner used the gun(s) against the woman, usually threatening to shoot/kill her (71.4%) or to shoot at her (5.1%). Most battered women thought spousal notification/consultation regarding gun purchase would be useful and that a personalized firearm ("smart gun") in the home would make things worse.

Conclusions. A wide range of objects are used as weapons against intimate partners. Firearms, especially handguns, are more common in the homes of battered women than in households in the general population.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. A. Vittes and S. B. Sorenson Keeping Guns Out of the Hands of Abusers: Handgun Purchases and Restraining Orders Am J Public Health, May 1, 2008; 98(5): 828 - 831. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Garcia, C. Soria, and E. L. Hurwitz Homicides and Intimate Partner Violence: A Literature Review Trauma Violence Abuse, October 1, 2007; 8(4): 370 - 383. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. B. Sorenson Firearm Use in Intimate Partner Violence: A Brief Overview Eval Rev, June 1, 2006; 30(3): 229 - 236. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. L. Seave Disarming Batterers Through Restraining Orders: The Promise and the Reality in California Eval Rev, June 1, 2006; 30(3): 245 - 265. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. A. Vittes and S. B. Sorenson Are Temporary Restraining Orders More Likely to Be Issued When Applications Mention Firearms? Eval Rev, June 1, 2006; 30(3): 266 - 282. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. F. Rothman, R. M. Johnson, and D. Hemenway Gun Possession among Massachusetts Batterer Intervention Program Enrollees Eval Rev, June 1, 2006; 30(3): 283 - 295. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. B. Sorenson and H. Shen Restraining Orders in California: A Look at Statewide Data Violence Against Women, July 1, 2005; 11(7): 912 - 933. [Abstract] [PDF]