© 2005 American Public Health Association DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2003.036715
Dileep V. Mavalankar is with the Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, India. Allan Rosenfield is with the Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY. Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Allan Rosenfield, MD, Columbia University, Mailman School of Public Health, 722 W 168th St, Rm 1408, New York, NY 10032 (e-mail: ar32{at}columbia.edu).
Maternal mortality remains one of the most daunting public health problems in resource-poor settings, and reductions in maternal mortality have been identified as a prominent component of the United Nations Millennium Development Goals. The World Health Organization estimates that 515000 women die each year from pregnancy-related causes, and almost all of these deaths occur in developing countries. Evidence has shown that access to and utilization of high-quality emergency obstetric care (EmOC) is central to efforts aimed at reducing maternal mortality. We analyzed health care policies that restrict access to life-saving EmOC in most resource-poor settings, focusing on examples from rural India, a country of more than 1 billion people that contributes approximately 20% to 24% of the worlds maternal deaths. This article has been cited by other articles:
eLetters:Read all eLetters
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||