Advertisement
AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow purchase articles
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Get other permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilensky, S.
Right arrow Articles by Mizeur, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wilensky, S.
Right arrow Articles by Mizeur, H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other Health Financing
Right arrow Other Health Service Delivery
February 2005, Vol 95, No. 2 | American Journal of Public Health 254-259
© 2005 American Public Health Association
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2002.003723


RESEARCH AND PRACTICE

State-Funded Comprehensive Primary Medical Care Service Programs for Medically Underserved Populations: 1995 vs 2000

Sara Wilensky, JD, Sara Rosenbaum, JD, Dan Hawkins and Heather Mizeur

Sara Wilensky and Sara Rosenbaum are with the Department of Health Policy, School of Public Health and Health Services, George Washington University, Washington, DC. Dan Hawkins and Heather Mizeur are with the National Association of Community Health Centers, Bethesda, Md.

Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Sara Wilensky, JD, Department of Health Policy, School of Public Health and Health Services, George Washington University, 2021 K St, NW, Suite 800, Washington, DC, 20006 (e-mail: wilensky{at}gwu.edu).

Objectives. We analyzed responses to the 2000 Comprehensive Primary Medical Care programs for Medically Underserved Populations Survey and compared them with the 1995 survey results to identify trends.

Methods. Surveys were mailed to all primary care program offices. State primary care program associations reviewed primary care program offices’ responses and completed surveys for offices that did not respond.

Results. We identified 30 qualified primary care programs in 24 states that had an overall funding level of $215 million. Most states allowed funds to be spent on expanding service areas, buying equipment, and hiring and training staff.

Conclusions. Although state funding has increased overall, many states do not have comprehensive primary care programs, and an increasing number of states are experiencing budget deficits that may lead to reductions in existing programs.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Public Health Association