Comparative Geographic Concentrations of 4 Sexually Transmitted Infections
Roxanne P. Kerani, PhD, MPH,
Mark S. Handcock, PhD,
H. Hunter Handsfield, MD and
King K. Holmes, MD, PhD
At the time of the study, H. Hunter Handsfield, King K. Holmes, and Roxanne P. Kerani were with the Center for AIDS and STD at the University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle. H. Hunter Handsfield also is affiliated with Public HealthSeattle and King County, Seattle, Wash. Mark S. Handcock is with the Department of Statistics at the University of Washington.
Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Roxanne Kerani, MPH, PhD, Public HealthSeattle and King County, Harborview Medical Center, #359777, 325 9th Ave, Seattle, WA 98104 (e-mail: rkerani{at}u.washington.edu).
Objectives. We measured and compared the concentration of primaryand secondary syphilis, gonorrhea, chlamydial infection, andgenital herpes in a large county with urban, suburban, and ruralsettings.
Methods. We geocoded sexually transmitted infections reportedto King County, Washington health department in 20002001to census tract of residence. We used a model-based approachto measure concentration with Lorenz curves and Gini coefficients.
Results. Syphilis exhibited the highest level of concentration(estimated Gini coefficient = 0.68, 95% confidence interval[CI] = 0.64, 0.78), followed by gonorrhea (estimated Gini coefficient=0.57;95% CI=0.54, 0.60), chlamydial infection (estimated Gini coefficient= 0.45; 95% CI = 0.40, 0.43), and herpes (estimated Gini coefficient=0.26;95% CI=0.22, 0.29).
Conclusions. Geographically targeted interventions may be mostappropriate for syphilis and gonorrhea. For less-concentratedinfections, control strategies must reach a wider portion ofthe population.
This article has been cited by other articles:
M. I. Chen, A. C. Ghani, and W. J. Edmunds A metapopulation modelling framework for gonorrhoea and other sexually transmitted infections in heterosexual populations
J R Soc Interface,
September 6, 2009;
6(38):
775 - 791.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
M J Nsuami, S N Taylor, B S Smith, and D H Martin Increases in gonorrhea among high school students following hurricane Katrina
Sex Transm Inf,
June 1, 2009;
85(3):
194 - 198.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
E Schleihauf, R E Watkins, and A J Plant Heterogeneity in the spatial distribution of bacterial sexually transmitted infections
Sex Transm Inf,
February 1, 2009;
85(1):
45 - 49.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
A. Scoular, K. Abu-Rajab, A. Winter, J. Connell, and G. Hart The case for social marketing in gonorrhoea prevention: insights from sexual lifestyles in Glasgow genitourinary medicine clinic attendees
Int J STD AIDS,
August 1, 2008;
19(8):
545 - 549.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
G. Chowell, L. M.A Bettencourt, N. Johnson, W. J Alonso, and C. Viboud The 1918-1919 influenza pandemic in England and Wales: spatial patterns in transmissibility and mortality impact
Proc R Soc B,
March 7, 2008;
275(1634):
501 - 509.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
C. L Risley, H. Ward, B. Choudhury, C. J Bishop, K. A Fenton, B. G Spratt, C. A Ison, and A. C Ghani Geographical and demographic clustering of gonorrhoea in London
Sex Transm Inf,
October 1, 2007;
83(6):
481 - 487.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
H. W Chesson and P. J White Influence of epidemic phase on the cost effectiveness of a prevention intervention for sexually transmitted infection: an exploratory analysis
Sex Transm Inf,
August 1, 2007;
83(suppl_1):
i25 - i29.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
M D Cusimano, M Chipman, R H Glazier, C Rinner, and S P Marshall Geomatics in injury prevention: the science, the potential and the limitations
Inj. Prev.,
February 1, 2007;
13(1):
51 - 56.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]