HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (5) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kinne, S. Articles by Topolski, T. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kinne, S. Articles by Topolski, T. D. Related Collections Disability Surveillance Surveys

Susan Kinne, PhD and Tari D. Topolski, PhD

Susan Kinne and Tari Topolski are with the Center for Disability Policy and Research, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle.

Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Susan Kinne, CDPR, 146 N Canal St No. 313, Seattle, WA 98103 (e-mail: susaki{at}u.washington.edu).

Objectives. Telephone survey data are widely used to describe population health, but some fear that people with disabilities cannot participate. We tested the hypothesis that a telephone survey would underrepresent adults with disabilities, and that the adults with disabilities who responded would report lower prevalences of sensory, mental, self-care, and multiple limitations than those observed in people with disabilities in the general population.

Methods. We compared characteristics of adults with disabilities identified by the 2001 Washington State Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey (BRFSS) to Washington adults with disabilities in the Census 2000 Supplementary Survey (C2SS), to 2 BRFSS Disability Supplements, and to the Washington State Population Survey. All except the C2SS are telephone surveys.

Results. Contrary to expectations, post hoc analyses of all telephone surveys found significantly higher prevalence of disability in the Washington adult population than did the C2SS. The hypothesis of more sensory, mental, and self-care limitation in telephone disability samples was supported in only 2 of 11 instances in which a disability sample was asked about 1 of these limitations. Findings were not explained by differences in disability definition or type of informant.

Conclusions. These results suggest that population telephone surveys do not underrepresent adults with disabilities. The counterintuitive finding of their higher survey participation raises further questions.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				W. Junfang, Z. Biao, Z. Weijun, S. Zhang, W. Yinyin, and K. Chen Perceived unmet need for hospitalization service among elderly Chinese people in Zhejiang province J. Public Health Med., February 6, 2009; (2009) fdp007v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Okoro, T. Strine, L. McGuire, L. Balluz, and A. Mokdad Employment status and frequent mental distress among adults with disabilities Occup. Med., May 1, 2007; 57(3): 217 - 220. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]