HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: AJPH.2004.058933v1 95/7/1123    most recent Submit a response View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (26) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Dickert, N. Articles by Sugarman, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Dickert, N. Articles by Sugarman, J. Related Collections Ethics Genetics Global Health HIV/AIDS

Neal Dickert, BA and Jeremy Sugarman, MD, MPH, MA

The authors are with the Phoebe R. Berman Bioethics Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md. Jeremy Sugarman also is with the Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University.

Correspondence: Request for reprints should be sent to Jeremy Sugarman, MD, MPH, MA, Phoebe R. Berman Bioethics Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Hampton House 351, 624 N Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205 (e-mail: jsugarm1{at}jhmi.edu).

In response to the traditional emphasis on the rights, interests, and well-being of individual research subjects, there has been growing attention focused on the importance of involving communities in research development and approval.

Community consultation is a particularly common method of involving communities. However, the fundamental ethical goals of community consultation have not been delineated, which makes it difficult for investigators, sponsors, and institutional review boards to design and evaluate consultation efforts.

Community consultation must be tailored to the communities in which it is conducted, but the purposes of consultation—the ethical goals it is designed to achieve—should be universal. We propose 4 ethical goals that give investigators, sponsors, institutional review boards, and communities a framework for evaluating community consultation processes.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Perez, P. Lefevre, M. I. Romero, L. Sanchez, P. De Vos, and P. Van der Stuyft Augmenting frameworks for appraising the practices of community-based health interventions Health Policy Plan., September 1, 2009; 24(5): 335 - 341. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. A. Tisherman, J. L. Powell, T. A. Schmidt, T. P. Aufderheide, P. J. Kudenchuk, J. Spence, D. Climer, D. Kelly, A. Marcantonio, T. Brown, et al. Regulatory Challenges for the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Circulation, October 7, 2008; 118(15): 1585 - 1592. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Epstein The rise of 'recruitmentology': clinical research, racial knowledge, and the politics of inclusion and difference. Social Studies of Science, October 1, 2008; 38(5): 801 - 832. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. B. Resnik and S. Wing Lessons Learned From the Children's Environmental Exposure Research Study Am J Public Health, March 1, 2007; 97(3): 414 - 418. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. A. Marshall, C. A. Adebamowo, A. A. Adeyemo, T. O. Ogundiran, M. Vekich, T. Strenski, J. Zhou, T. E. Prewitt, R. S. Cooper, and C. N. Rotimi Voluntary Participation and Informed Consent to International Genetic Research Am J Public Health, November 1, 2006; 96(11): 1989 - 1995. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. W. Foster and R. R. Sharp Ethical issues in medical-sequencing research: implications of genotype-phenotype studies for individuals and populations. Hum. Mol. Genet., April 15, 2006; 15(suppl_1): R45 - R49. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]