© 2007 American Public Health Association DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.073817
Rajiv Bhatia is with the San Francisco Department of Public Health and the University of California, San Francisco. Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Rajiv Bhatia, MD, MPH, 1390 Market St, Ste 822, San Francisco, CA 94102 (e-mail: rajiv.bhatia{at}sfdph.org).
ABSTRACT
Laws and regulations for an environmental impact assessment enable a health impact assessment whenever physical changes in the environment may significantly affect health. In this case study, I describe 2 instances in which a local public health agency used the procedural requirements for an environmental impact assessment to account for societal-level health determinants that are not traditionally evaluated in land-use decisions. These examples show that a public health critique can contribute both to the scope of analysis in an environmental impact assessment and to substantive changes in land-use decisions. I have evaluated this health appraisal approach as a form of a health impact assessment and will make recommendations for law, research, and practice that support its technical, cultural, and political feasibility. This article has been cited by other articles:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||