© 2007 American Public Health Association DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.078345
Miguel Muñoz-Laboy is with the Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY. Brian Dodge is with the Department of Behavioral Science and Community Health, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville. Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Miguel Muñoz-Laboy, DrPH, Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 722 West 168th street, 5th floor, New York, NY 10032 (e-mail: mam172{at}columbia.edu).
Objectives. We sought to determine whether there were differences in sexual risk among behaviorally and self-identified bisexual men, men who reported having sex with both men and women without reporting a bisexual identity and men who self-identified as bisexual but reported only recent homosexual behavior over the past 6 months. Methods.secondary data analysis, we conducted stepwise linear regression equation modeling to determine which factors were significant predictors of sexual risk among various subgroups of bisexual Latino men. Results. Having sex with women, regardless of sexual identity, increased the likelihood of insertive unprotected anal intercourse with men. Bisexual identity was not statistically associated with unprotected anal intercourse with men. Conclusions. Future studies should begin to examine differences within groups rather than focusing on group comparisons that yield limited insights into sexual risk predictors for homosexually and bisexually active men. Further research that explores risk and protective factors in the sexual lives of Latino bisexual men is also needed. This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||