Effect of Smoke-Free Laws on Bar Value and Profits
Benjamin Alamar, PhD and
Stanton A. Glantz, PhD
The authors are with the Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, Department of Medicine (Cardiology), University of California, San Francisco.
Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Stanton A. Glantz, PhD, 530 Parnassus St, Suite 366, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-1390 (e-mail: glantz{at}medicine.ucsf.edu).
The tobacco industry has claimed that smoke-free bar laws causedbar revenues to decline by 30%. After we controlled for economicvariables, we found that bars located in areas with smoke-freelaws sold for prices that were comparable to prices for similarbars in areas with no smoking restrictions. Other studies havereported that sales did not decline, and we also found thatneither price nor sales declined. Therefore, bar ownersconcerns that smoke-free laws will reduce the value of theirbars are unfounded.
This article has been cited by other articles:
M. Erazo, V. Iglesias, A. Droppelmann, M. Acuna, A. Peruga, P. N. Breysse, and A. Navas-Acien Secondhand tobacco smoke in bars and restaurants in Santiago, Chile: evaluation of partial smoking ban legislation in public places
Tob. Control,
August 25, 2010;
(2010)
tc.2009.035402v1.
[Abstract][Full Text]
R M Merrill, R A Castleton, and G B Lindsay Sectors of the Russian economy that would benefit from reduced cigarette sales
Tob. Control,
December 1, 2009;
18(6):
505 - 508.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
L. O. Gostin Global Regulatory Strategies for Tobacco Control
JAMA,
November 7, 2007;
298(17):
2057 - 2059.
[Full Text][PDF]
M. Eriksen and F. Chaloupka The Economic Impact of Clean Indoor Air Laws
CA Cancer J Clin,
November 1, 2007;
57(6):
367 - 378.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]