HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: AJPH.2007.117770v1 98/6/1021    most recent Submit a response View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Glass, N. Articles by Campbell, J. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Glass, N. Articles by Campbell, J. C.

Nancy Glass, PhD, MPH, RN, Nancy Perrin, PhD, Ginger Hanson, MS, Tina Bloom, MPH, RN, Emily Gardner, MA and Jacquelyn C. Campbell, PhD, RN, FAAN

Nancy Glass and Jacquelyn C. Campbell are with the Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD. Nancy Perrin, Ginger Hanson, and Tina Bloom are with the Oregon Health and Science University School of Nursing, Portland. At the time of the study, Emily Gardner was with Bradley Angle House Domestic Violence Program, Portland.

Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Nancy Glass, Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, 525 N Wolfe St, Rm 439, Baltimore, MD 21205.

Objectives. We revised the Danger Assessment to predict reassault in abusive female same-sex relationships.

Methods. We used focus groups and interviews to evaluate the assessment tool and identify new risk factors and telephone interviews at baseline and at 1-month follow-up to evaluate the revised assessment.

Results. The new assessment tool comprised 8 original and 10 new items. Predictors included increase in physical violence (relative risk ratio [RRR]=1.95; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.84, 4.54), constant jealousy or possessiveness of abuser (RRR = 4.07; 95% CI = 0.61, 27.00), cohabitation (RRR = 1.96; 95% CI = 0.54, 7.12), threats or use of gun by abuser (RRR=1.93; 95% CI=0.79, 4.75), alcoholism or problem drinking of abuser (RRR=1.47; 95% CI=0.79, 2.71), illegal drug use or abuse of prescription medications by abuser (RRR = 1.33; 95% CI = 0.72, 2.46), stalking by abuser (RRR=1.39; 95% CI=0.70, 2.76), failure of individuals to take victim seriously when she sought help (RRR=1.66; 95% CI=0.90, 3.05), victim’s fear of reinforcing negative stereotypes (RRR=1.42; 95% CI=0.73, 2.77), and secrecy of abuse (RRR=1.72; 95% CI=0.74, 3.99). Both unweighted (P < .005) and weighted (P < .004) versions of the revised assessment were significant predictors of reassault.

Conclusions. The revised Danger Assessment accurately assesses risk of re-assault in abusive female relationships.