Advertisement
AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


AJPH First Look, published online ahead of print May 29, 2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
AJPH.2007.116020v1
98/7/1306    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow purchase articles
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Get other permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by White, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Roderick, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by White, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Roderick, P. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other Chronic Disease
Right arrow Global Health
Right arrow Socioeconomic Factors
July 2008, Vol 98, No. 7 | American Journal of Public Health 1306-1313
© 2008 American Public Health Association
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.116020


RESEARCH AND PRACTICE

Socioeconomic Disadvantage and Kidney Disease in the United States, Australia, and Thailand

Sarah L. White, MPH, Kevin McGeechan, MBiostat, Michael Jones, PhD, Alan Cass, PhD, FRACP, Steven J. Chadban, PhD, FRACP, Kevan R. Polkinghorne, FRACP, Vlado Perkovic, PhD, FRACP and Paul J. Roderick, MD, FRCP

Sarah L. White, Alan Cass, and Vlado Perkovic are with the George Institute, Sydney, Australia, and the Central Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney. Kevin McGeechan is with the School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney. At the time of the study, Michael Jones was with the School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney. Steven J. Chadban is with Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, and the Central Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney. Kevan R. Polkinghorne is with Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, Australia. Paul J. Roderick is with the University of Southampton, Southampton, England.

Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Sarah L. White, The George Institute, PO Box M201, Missenden Road, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia (e-mail: swhite{at}george.org.au).

Objectives. We sought to determine whether an elevated burden of chronic kidney disease is found among disadvantaged groups living in the United States, Australia, and Thailand.

Methods. We used data on participants 35 years or older for whom a valid serum creatinine measurement was available from studies in the United States, Thailand, and Australia. We used logistic regression to analyze the association of income, education, and employment with the prevalence of chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate<60 mL/min/1.73 m2).

Results. Age- and gender-adjusted odds of having chronic kidney disease were increased 86% for US Whites in the lowest income quartile versus the highest quartile (odds ratio [OR] = 1.86; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.27, 2.72). Odds were increased 2 times and 6 times, respectively, among unemployed (not retired) versus employed non-Hispanic Black and Mexican American participants (OR=2.89; 95% CI=1.53, 5.46; OR=6.62; 95% CI=1.94, 22.64. respectively). Similar associations were not evident for the Australian or Thai populations.

Conclusions. Higher kidney disease prevalence among financially disadvantaged groups in the United States should be considered when chronic kidney disease prevention and management strategies are created. This approach is less likely to be of benefit to the Australian and Thai populations.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Public Health Association