HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: AJPH.2008.134932v1 99/3/480    most recent Submit a response View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Boardman, J. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Boardman, J. D. Related Collections Genetics Other Statistics/Evaluation/Research Other Tobacco Tobacco Control

Jason D. Boardman, PhD

Jason D. Boardman is with the Department of Sociology and the Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado, Boulder.

Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Jason D. Boardman, Department of Sociology, University of Colorado at Boulder, 219 Ketchum Hall, 327 UCB, Boulder, CO 80309-0327 (e-mail: boardman{at}colorado.edu).

Objectives. I examined genetic influences on smoking among adolescents and differences in the heritability of smoking across states in the United States.

Methods. With data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (participants aged 12–21 years), I used a multilevel twin- and sibling-pair (N = 2060 pairs) regression model.

Results. Daily smoking (hereditability estimate [h²] = 0.54) and smoking onset (h² = 0.42) were both highly heritable. Whereas the genetic influences on smoking onset were consistent across states, there was significant variation in these influences on daily smoking. Genetic influences on daily smoking were lower in states with relatively high taxes on cigarettes and in those with greater controls on the vending machines and cigarette advertising. Genetic influences were also negatively associated with rates of smoking among youths.

Conclusions. At the state level, gene–environment interaction models are best characterized by the model of social control. State policies may influence genetic tendencies to smoke regularly, but they have not affected the genetic contributions to cigarette onset or experimentation. Future tobacco-control policies may emphasize the heritable endophenotypes that increase the likelihood that adolescents will initiate smoking.