© 2009 American Public Health Association DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.131656
Joseph E. Balog is with the Department of Health Science, College at Brockport, State University of New York. Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Joseph E. Balog, Department of Health Science, The College at Brockport, State University of New York, 350 New Campus Dr, 19 Hartwell Hall, Brockport, New York 14420 (e-mail: jbalog{at}brockport.edu).
Compulsory human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination of young girls has been proposed as a public health intervention to reduce the threat of the disease. Such a program would entail a symbiotic relationship between scientific interests in reducing mortality and morbidity and philosophical interests in promoting morality. This proposal raises the issue of whether government should use its police powers to restrict liberty and parental autonomy for the purpose of preventing harm to young people. I reviewed the scientific literature that questions the value of a HPV vaccination. Applying a principle-based approach to moral reasoning, I concluded that compulsory HPV vaccinations can be justified on moral, scientific, and public health grounds.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||