Advertisement
AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


AJPH First Look, published online ahead of print Jul 16, 2009
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
AJPH.2008.134767v1
99/9/1567    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow purchase articles
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Get other permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Amico, K. R.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Amico, K. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Health Promotion
Right arrow Other Statistics/Evaluation/Research
Right arrow Writing/Reviewing/Publishing
September 2009, Vol 99, No. 9 | American Journal of Public Health 1567-1575
© 2009 American Public Health Association
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.134767


HEALTH POLICY AND ETHICS

Percent Total Attrition: A Poor Metric for Study Rigor in Hosted Intervention Designs

K. Rivet Amico, PhD

K. Rivet Amico is with the Department of Psychology, University of Connecticut, Storrs.

Correspondence: Correspondence should be sent to K. Pivet Amico, PhD, Department of Psychology, 2006 Hillside Rd, Unit 1248, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269-1248 (e-mail: rivetamico{at}comcast.net). Reprints can be ordered at http://www.ajph.org by clicking the "Reprints/Eprints" link.

Health behavior interventions delivered at point of service include those that yoke an intervention protocol with existing systems of care (e.g., clinical care, social work, or case management). Though beneficial in a number of ways, such "hosted" intervention studies may be unable to retain participants that specifically discontinue their use of the hosting service.

In light of recent practices that use percent total attrition as indicative of methodological flaws, hosted interventions targeting hard-to-reach populations may be excluded from consideration in effective intervention compendiums or research synthesis because of high attrition rates that may in fact be secondary to the natural flow of service use or unrelated to differential attrition or internal design flaws. Better methods to characterize rigor are needed.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the American Public Health Association