Advertisement
AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


AJPH First Look, published online ahead of print Jan 2, 2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
AJPH.2007.114710v1
AJPH.2007.114710v2
AJPH.2007.114710v3
98/9/1706    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow purchase articles
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Get other permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dausey, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Lurie, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dausey, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Lurie, N.
©
American Journal of Public Health, 10.2105/AJPH.2007.114710


Research and Practice

Measuring the Performance of Telephone-Based Disease Surveillance Systems in Local Health Departments

David J. Dausey 1*, Anita Chandra 1, Agnes G. Schaefer 1, Ben Bahney 1, Amelia Haviland 1, Sarah Zakowski 1, Nicole Lurie 1

1 RAND Corporation

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: dausey{at}rand.org.


   Abstract

Objectives. We tested telephone-based disease surveillance systems in local health departments to identify system characteristics associated with consistent and timely responses to urgent case reports.

Methods. We identified a stratified random sample of 74 health departments and conducted a series of unannounced tests of their telephone-based surveillance systems. We used regression analyses to identify system characteristics that predicted fast connection with an action officer (an appropriate public health professional).

Results. Optimal performance in consistently connecting callers with an action officer in 30 minutes or less was achieved by 31% of participating health departments. Reaching a live person upon dialing, regardless of who that person was, was the strongest predictor of optimal performance both in being connected with an action officer and in consistency of connection times.

Conclusions. Health departments can achieve optimal performance in consistently connecting a caller with an action officer in 30 minutes or less and may improve performance by using a telephone-based disease surveillance system in which the phone is answered by a live person at all times.

Key Words: Epidemiology, Health Policy, Public Health Practice, Surveillance, Statistics/Evaluation/Research




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
J. S. Ringel, E. Trentacost, and N. Lurie
How Well Did Health Departments Communicate About Risk At The Start Of The Swine Flu Epidemic In 2009?
Health Aff., July 1, 2009; 28(4): w743 - w750.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2008 by the American Public Health Association