Advertisement
AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


AJPH First Look, published online ahead of print Oct 15, 2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
AJPH.2007.125849v1
98/12/2229    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow purchase articles
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Get other permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hornik, R.
Right arrow Articles by Kalton, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hornik, R.
Right arrow Articles by Kalton, G.
©
American Journal of Public Health, 10.2105/AJPH.2007.125849


Research and Practice

Effects of the National Youth Anti-Drug Media Campaign on Youths

Robert Hornik 1*, Lela Jacobsohn 1, Robert Orwin 2, Andrea Piesse 2, Graham Kalton 2

1 University of Pennsylvania
2 Westat

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: rhornik{at}asc.upenn.edu.


   Abstract

Objectives. We examined the cognitive and behavioral effects of the National Youth Anti-Drug Media Campaign on youths aged 12.5 to 18 years and report core evaluation results.

Methods. From September 1999 to June 2004, 3 nationally representative cohorts of US youths aged 9 to 18 years were surveyed at home 4 times. Sample size ranged from 8117 in the first to 5126 in the fourth round (65% first-round response rate, with 86%–93% of still eligible youths interviewed subsequently). Main outcomes were self-reported lifetime, past-year, and past-30-day marijuana use and related cognitions.

Results. Most analyses showed no effects from the campaign. At one round, however, more ad exposure predicted less intention to avoid marijuana use (c=–0.07; 95% confidence interval [CI]=–0.13, –0.01) and weaker antidrug social norms (c=–0.05; 95% CI=–0.08, –0.02) at the subsequent round. Exposure at round 3 predicted marijuana initiation at round 4 (c=0.11; 95% CI=0.00, 0.22).

Conclusions. Through June 2004, the campaign is unlikely to have had favorable effects on youths and may have had delayed unfavorable effects. The evaluation challenges the usefulness of the campaign.

Key Words: Child and Adolescent Health, Health Promotion, Media, Prevention, Statistics/Evaluation/Research, Drugs







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2008 by the American Public Health Association