Advertisement
AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


AJPH First Look, published online ahead of print Sep 17, 2009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
AJPH.2008.147462v1
AJPH.2008.147462v2    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow purchase articles
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Get other permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lippman, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kerrigan, D.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lippman, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kerrigan, D.
©
American Journal of Public Health, 10.2105/AJPH.2008.147462


Research and Practice

Social-Environmental Factors and Protective Sexual Behavior Among Sex Workers: The Encontros Intervention in Brazil

Sheri A. Lippman 1*, Angela Donini 2, Juan Díaz 3, Magda Chinaglia 3, Arthur Reingold 1, Deanna Kerrigan 4

1 University of California, Berkeley
2 Brazilian Ministry of Health, STI/AIDS Program
3 Population Council, Brazil & Reprolatina, Brazil
4 Johns Hopkins School of Public Health

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: slippman{at}berkeley.edu.


   Abstract

Objectives. We sought to determine the association of social environmental factors with condom use and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) among 420 sex workers participating in an STI/HIV prevention study in Corumbá, Brazil, to inform future intervention efforts.

Methods. Participants provided urine samples for polymerase chain reaction testing of chlamydia and gonorrhea and responded to multi-item scales addressing perceived social cohesion, participation in networks, and access to and management of resources. We conducted multivariate log-linear and negative binomial regression analyses of these data.

Results. Increased social cohesion was inversely associated with number of unprotected sex acts in the preceding week among women (adjusted incidence rate ratio [IRR]=0.80; P<.01), and there was a marginal association among men (adjusted IRR=0.41; P=.08). Women’s increased participation in social networks was associated with a decrease in frequency of unprotected sex acts (adjusted IRR=0.83; P=.04), as was men’s access to and management of social and material resources (IRR=0.15; P=.01). Social–environmental factors were not associated with STIs.

Conclusions. The social context within which populations negotiate sexual behaviors is associated with condom use. Future efforts to prevent STI/HIV should incorporate strategies to modify the social environment.

Key Words: Health Promotion, HIV/AIDS, Prevention, Sexual Health, Social Science







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2009 by the American Public Health Association