Advertisement
AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


AJPH First Look, published online ahead of print Oct 15, 2009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
AJPH.2009.161638v1
99/12/2217    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow purchase articles
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Get other permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Durkin, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Wakefield, M. A.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Durkin, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Wakefield, M. A.
©
American Journal of Public Health, 10.2105/AJPH.2009.161638


Research and Practice

Effects of Different Types of Antismoking Ads on Reducing Disparities in Smoking Cessation Among Socioeconomic Subgroups

Sarah J. Durkin 1*, Lois Biener 2, Melanie A. Wakefield 1

1 The Cancer Council Victoria
2 University of Massachusetts at Boston

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: sarah.durkin{at}cancervic.org.au.


   Abstract

Objectives. We assessed which types of mass media messages might reduce disparities in smoking prevalence among disadvantaged population subgroups.

Methods. We followed 1491 adult smokers over 24 months and related quitting status at follow-up to exposure to antismoking ads in the 2 years prior to the baseline assessment.

Results. On average, smokers were exposed to more than 200 antismoking ads during the 2-year period, as estimated by televised gross ratings points (GRPs). The odds of having quit at follow-up increased by 11% with each 10 additional potential ad exposures (per 1000 points, odds ratio [OR]=1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.00, 1.23; P<.05). Greater exposure to ads that contained highly emotional elements or personal stories drove this effect (OR=1.14; 95% CI 1.02, 1.29; P<.05), which was greater among respondents with low and mid-socioeconomic status than among high–socioeconomic status groups.

Conclusions. Emotionally evocative ads and ads that contain personalized stories about the effects of smoking and quitting hold promise for efforts to promote smoking cessation and reduce socioeconomic disparities in smoking.

Key Words: Health Education, Health Promotion, Media, Smoking Cessation, Tobacco Control, Tobacco




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
AJPHHome page
K. L. Daniel, J. M. Bernhardt, and D. Eroglu
Social Marketing and Health Communication: From People to Places
Am J Public Health, December 1, 2009; 99(12): 2120 - 2122.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2009 by the American Public Health Association