© 2008 American Public Health Association DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.145151
Dominique P. Béhague is with the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, England. Katerini T. Storeng is a research degree student at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London. Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Dominique P. Béhague, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK (e-mail: dominique.behague@lshtm.ac.uk).
Thank you for the opportunity to respond to Yeh and Brandess letter regarding our article.1 We are encouraged by their interest and will address their three points below.
First, Yeh and Brandes are concerned that our use of opportunistic or purposive sampling, being nonsystematic and nonprobabilistic, has biased our results. However, for certain types of research questions, purposive sampling generates data of higher quality, validity, and pertinence than does systematic sampling.2 This is particularly the case when studying socially complex phenomena and when seeking to explore the views of specific types of informants. Additionally, unlike sampling from a known population
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||