Advertisement
AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


AJPH First Look, published online ahead of print Jun 12, 2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
AJPH.2008.140376v1
98/8/1350-a    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow purchase articles
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Get other permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baker, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Baker, J. P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Immunization/Vaccines
Right arrow Prevention
Right arrow Other Child and Adolescent Health
August 2008, Vol 98, No. 8 | American Journal of Public Health 1350-1351
© 2008 American Public Health Association
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.140376


LETTER

BAKER RESPONDS

Jeffrey P. Baker, MD, PhD

Correspondence: Correspondence should be sent to Jeffrey P. Baker, MD, PhD, Trent Center for Bioethics, Humanities, and History of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Box 3675 (DUMC), Durham, NC 27710 (e-mail: baker009@mc.duke.edu).

Because this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

I appreciate Silbergeld’s balanced and thoughtful remarks. It is true that as early as the 1940s, thimerosal was recognized to cause topical hypersensitivity as measured by skin tests. The US Food and Drug Administration cited these concerns in its proposed rules on preservatives in skin tests and over-the-counter topical products in 1978 and 1982, as did some European countries that restricted thimerosal in the 1990s.1,2 The clinical significance of this phenomenon, however, was related to contact dermatitis rather than neurotoxicity, the focus of my article and of the vaccine and autism debate.

Although more recent studies have shown that methylmercury . . . [Full Text]







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Public Health Association