Advertisement
AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


AJPH First Look, published online ahead of print Nov 13, 2008
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
AJPH.2008.148684v1
99/1/6    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow purchase articles
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Get other permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ahrens, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ahrens, D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Socioeconomic Factors
Right arrow Other Tobacco
January 2009, Vol 99, No. 1 | American Journal of Public Health 6-7
© 2009 American Public Health Association
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.148684


LETTERS

TOBACCO TAXES AND CIGARETTE CONSUMPTION IN LOW INCOME POPULATIONS

David Ahrens, MS

David Ahrens is with the Population Health Institute, University of Wisconsin, Madison.

Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to David Ahrens, MS, University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, Madison, WI 53726 (e-mail: ahrens@wisc.edu).

Because this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

In their letter in response to Franks et al.’s analysis of the failure of tobacco taxes to effectively reduce smoking among lower socioeconomic status smokers,1 Farrelly and Engelen assert that concerns about the regressivity of tobacco can "easily be addressed...by earmarking revenue from cigarette excise taxes to evidence based smoking cessation interventions targeted to low income populations with the highest smoking rates."2(p582)

This is a noble sentiment, but optimistic, given political reality. After a decade of more than 100 separate state increases in tobacco taxes and strong efforts by public health advocates, there have been few instances of such an . . . [Full Text]







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the American Public Health Association