© 2009 American Public Health Association DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.169912
All authors are with the Department of Environmental Medicine and Center for AIDS Research, School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY. Correspondence: Correspondence should be sent to Michael Marmor, PhD, Professor of Environmental Medicine and Medicine, Department of Environmental Medicine, 650 First Avenue, Room 560, New York, NY 10016 (e-mail: michael.marmor@nyumc.org). Reprints can be ordered at http://www.ajph.org by clicking on the "Reprints/Eprints" link.
The recent article by Grudzen et al.1 is an important look at the workplace safety of pornography performers in the United States. We are concerned, however, that its portrayal of condom use in pornography viewed by men who have sex with men (MSM) may be inaccurate and thus may divert attention from an issue with important public health implications. The authors report that 80% of penile–anal contacts in male homosexual pornography were protected by condoms; we believe that the frequency of protected sex in male homosexual pornography may be much lower, especially if one considers all forms of video pornography
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||