Advertisement
AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow purchase articles
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Get other permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (19)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gupta, S.
Right arrow Articles by Dahl, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gupta, S.
Right arrow Articles by Dahl, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other Health Service Delivery
Right arrow Immunization/Vaccines
Right arrow Screening
Right arrow Socioeconomic Factors
Right arrow Women's Health
Delivering Equitable Care: Comparing Preventive Services in Manitoba

Sumit Gupta, BSc, Leslie L. Roos, PhD, Randy Walld, BSc, BComm, Dawn Traverse, MSc and Matthew Dahl, BSc.

The authors are with the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, Department of Community Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg. Sumit Gupta is also with the Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Ontario. Dawn Traverse is also with the David Thompson Health Region, Red Deer, Alberta.



View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
  		Figure 1—— Percentage of Women Aged 50 to 69 Years With 1 Screening Mammogram in 2 Years: Manitoba, 1990s.

Note. Q1-R = lowest income quintile, rural; Q5-R = highest income quintile, rural; Q1-U = lowest quintile, urban; Q5-U = highest quintile, urban.

 


View larger version (10K):

[in a new window]
  		Figure 2—— Q1/Q5 Ratio for Women Aged 50 to 69 Years With 1 Screening Mammogram in 2 Years: Manitoba, 1990s.

Note. Q1 = lowest income quintile, Q5 = highest income quintile.

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
  		Figure 3—— Percentage of Children With Completed Immunization Schedules 365 and 730 Days After Birth: Manitoba, 1990s.

Note. Q1-R = lowest income quintile, rural; Q5-R = highest income quintile, rural; Q1-U = lowest quintile, urban; Q5-U = highest quintile, urban.

 


View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
  		Figure 4—— Percentage of Women Aged 18 to 69 Years With 1 or 2 Papanicolaou Tests in 3 Years: Manitoba, 1990s.

Note. Q1-R = lowest income quintile, rural; Q5-R = highest income quintile, rural; Q1-U = lowest quintile, urban; Q5-U = highest quintile, urban.

 




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Public Health Association