Advertisement
AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow purchase articles
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Get other permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (19)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shah, B. R.
Right arrow Articles by Hux, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shah, B. R.
Right arrow Articles by Hux, J. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Access to Care
Right arrow Quality of Care
Right arrow Native Americans
Right arrow Rural Health
Right arrow Socioeconomic Factors
Markers of Access to and Quality of Primary Care for Aboriginal People in Ontario, Canada

Baiju R. Shah, MD, Nadia Gunraj, MPH and Janet E. Hux, MD, SM

The authors are with the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario. Baiju R. Shah and Janet E. Hux are also with the Department of Medicine and the Clinical Epidemiology and Health Care Research Program, University of Toronto.



View larger version (9K):

[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1 —Relative admission rates for ambulatory care–sensitive conditions for the aboriginal population and the geographic and socioeconomic control populations, compared with the general population: Ontario, Canada, 1994–1995 and 1998–1999.

 


View larger version (10K):

[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2 —Relative utilization rates for referral care–sensitive procedures for the aboriginal population and the geographic and socioeconomic control populations, compared with the general population: Ontario, Canada, 1994–1995 and 1998–1999.

 


View larger version (9K):

[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3 —Relative admission rates for insensitive conditions for the aboriginal population and the geographic and socioeconomic control populations, compared with the general population: Ontario, Canada, 1994–1995 and 1998–1999.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Public Health Association